Just When I Thought I Couldn't Possibly Feel More Contempt for Governor Rauner...

Illinois’ Asshole in Chief does this!!

GODDAMMIT!!! The ONE thing I could be proud of my state for doing in abolishing the death penalty, and this fucking jagoff makes noise about reversing it!

Let me remind this moron that death row once held ELEVEN people that were later totally exonerated of their capital crimes by DNA testing. ELEVEN! Not two, not four, DOUBLE DIGIT ELEVEN completely innocent human beings almost murdered by the state. Almost a dozen. A full goddamn jury.

Republicans…Proving evolution doesn’t always work.

:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

IMO Rauner is trying to get the votes that went to Jeanne Ives (I think that’s the hate-filled witch’s name - I can’t be bothered to look it up).

Plus of course he’s trying to draw attention from his abysmal performance as Guv. The ads of his I’ve seen seem mostly to be <whine> <whine> “It’s all Mike Madigan’s fault.”

Regardless of how much of Illinois’ dysfunction can be laid at Madigan’s feet, he seems to totally avoid the question of why, not having been able to work with Madigan for 4 years, he’ll be somehow magically able to work with him now.

I was a bit disappointed that Pritzker won the Dem nom, but not only will I vote for him, I’ll volunteer for his campaign.

You don’t even need to be a bleeding heart liberal to hate this one.

Personally I have no problem seeing the likes of John Wayne Gacy get the electric chair.

Thing is having the death penalty does not deter crime and it can cost the state up to 10x as much to get a criminal into the chair as it does to incarcerate them for life.

Besides, death is too good for some of these creeps. Let 'em rot in a cell forever.

Yeah, Fuck Rauner. The moratorium was issued by a Republican, and regardless of his motivation, a moratorium it was. Fuck Rauner and any Illinois politician that supports this.

I guess it’s time once again to bring up the harrowing tale of Rolando Cruz. This was one of the cases that led to a moratorium on the death penalty in Illinois.

Rolando was tried, convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a child. Conviction thrown out, retried with the same result. Retried AGAIN, convicted again, overturned again.

The first trial contained this doozy:

Three prosecutors and four deputies perjured themselves and suborned perjury and hid exculpatory evidence all while knowing that actual perpetrator was already in prison for another series of murders.

We are not ready the Death Penalty.

I don’t know anything about the Cruz case other than what I just read in Wikipedia, but I can’t understand how Cruz’ attorney was not disbarred for doing a terrible job.

It’s not like he could afford F. Lee Bailey. Or even Beetle Bailey.

The bigger question is how come the prosecutors haven’t been disbarred.

This why the Biss babies need to vote for Pritzker. Pritzker isn’t a god, and he isn’t as ‘progressive’ as the idealistic Biss supporters would like. However, taking a step on a road forward is far better than pouting in the corner while the state continues to regress under Rauner.

This.

I do not understand how the Bernie supporters either sat out the 2016 general election, or voted for a third party. When you don’t get who you want in the primary, vote to do the most good in the general.

I liked Biss fine, but I voted for Kennedy. As I said upstream, I intend to volunteer for the Pritzker campaign for the general election. Not the person I ideally wanted for Guv, but a long sight better than the Guv we’re stuck with at the moment.

It’s a little hard to successfully defend your client when the prosecutors and law-enforcement personnel collude and perjure in order to railroad your client! :smack:

It’s the opposing, underlying philosophies at work.

Democrats tend to feel that they’d rather see guilty people go free than sentence one innocent man to prison or death.

Republicans and Authoritarians tend to feel that sentencing a few innocent people to prison or death is preferable to allowing one guilty man to go free.

These people attempted to kill a man they should have known to be innocent. They should be charged with attempted murder.

I recently mentioned a guy convicted of murder (in New York?) despite having a credible alibi witness. The alibi witness was never called: the public defender decided his meager investigation budget was inadequate for a drive to interview said witness.

[sarcasm] In a free market economy, job creators can afford better defense counsel, and therefore deserve better defense counsel, than freeloaders. If you don’t like it, go back to North Korea, you commie![/sarcasm]

Except being opposed to the death penalty isn’t about letting anyone “go free”. Well, aside from people later found to be innocent who we thankfully haven’t killed for great justice yet.

Not just Illinois:

Man free after 20 years in prison; lawyers say he’s innocent

Here’s the kicker.

How could the defense prove the statements contained exculpatory evidence if the defense didn’t have them???

The eyewitness was the guy was probably the shooter. Because:

Here’s a gem from the prosecutor:

Movie idea based on real life: Tough-on-crime prosecutor goes balls-out to win death penalty cases where the evidence is shaky…because he is a serial killer and his weapon is the Gas Chamber.