Where can I see that video? I mean, so I can be shocked and all. Twenty lines of coke??
Altho coke was the drug of (much richer girls than me who didn’t have to worry about being sent to Framingham Women’s Prison) choice at my school, that scene in ANNIE HALL ruined it for me.
I don’t mind a little celebrity gossip, but this is a pretty weak “busting”. I already assume that pretty much every celebrity uses drugs.
You don’t know the half of it, gumdrop…musta had around thirty “copyright violation” reports. That’ll teach me to sleep late on a Saturday morning.
Anyway, now you know, don’t do it again, blah blah, slap on wrist.
– Uke, CS mod
To look at her annual earnings, you could be forgiven for thinking she IS.
Jet-setters dabble in cocaine? Gee, you learn something new every day.
This is sweet, delicious, ice-cold revenge for the Mirror since they lost a libel case involving an earlier allegation that Kate Moss was a cokehead.
“You don’t believe us when we say she uses coke? Let’s get it on videotape! Muhahahaha!”
Barbarian I had the same thought. She won “substantial damages” and there is a Gary
“follow me around I don’t cheat” Hart/Frank (“Where is the oddest place you have ever made whopee”) Gifford feel to the whole thing to me – just saying
Links to wth previous suit
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1692572005
http://celebrity.aol.com/people/ataol/articles/0,19736,1087471,00.html
not to hijack, but:
much more interesting is the article on Jeb’s youngest being arrested for public drunkenness…
you may now resume your regularly scheduled Kate Moss discussion…
Where are the pictures/videos? The article I’m seeing seems to be plaintext.
People really need to get lives. You know you’re a loser when you concern yourself with tattling on people on the internet. 
But, don’t worry, it won’t happen again.
gawker.com still has screen shots of the Mirror’s front page. While most non-Brits don’t really care about Moss anymore, I’m not ashamed to be interested in this story for several reasons: She’s 31-- shouldn’t she have moved on by now? She has a two-year-old-- shouldn’t she be a bit more responsible?
Moss and her reps have clung to this idea that she’s naturally that thin for years. Yes, it comes as no shock that a (super)model’s blowing rails, but when is someone actually going to look at the whole modelling industry and say “Hmm, okay, 99% of these women have major eating disorders or/and do drugs. Maybe we should stop this. Maybe part of this should even be illegal, like, say, getting them started at 14.”
Also, it’s kind of nice to see a millionaire being publicly embarrassed- and snorting with a fiver.
Not anymore they don’t. Something about “Daily Mirror lawyers” has replaced the pictures.
Why, if I was a tattle tale loser with no life I might point that out as some kind of example. So good thing no-one would ever think of infringing Daily Mirror copyright here, eh? 
It’ll interesting to see what happens to her career re this. At 31 she’s on the downward slope for a magazine model, but (apparently) she still has a bunch of modeling contracts so she’s (apparently) quite successful for an older model.
It’s a two edged sword for advertisers - do you “understand” & use her because she’s now (for the moment) “extra-famous”, and people would probably pay more attention to your ad (using her face) or do you reject her for the the “druggie skank” aura she’s coated with now?
An interesting conundrum for an advertiser.
I was wondering about this, too. I guess it depends on the advertiser and their target market; I know she’s doing Chanel, Burberry, Christian Dior, and Rimmel right now (I’m sure there’s more). I can see Chanel dropping her for it, and maybe Christian Dior. Rimmel’s just fairly cheap makeup, so it is worn more by younger girls - perhaps they’ll want to get away from the “druggie skank” aura. Burberry? Someone I can see them keeping her on; they’re not as big as Chanel or Dior, so they might want the extra publicity.