Killing viruses

Sailor, please have a look at #3, second paragraph, below. Basically, the infected cell stops serving the body with its function, becoming a virus “factory” instead. While the body has a lot of redundancy, there is a point where the loss of function becomes critical.

DDG, please look at #6, second paragraph, below. Acyclovir has no affect on the immune system - it is used extensively for Herpes Simplex, Genitalis and Chicken Pox (Shingles in recurrence) to eliminate or at least significantly reduce symptoms. Acyclovir is used in AIDS and other immunodepressed patients, like organ transplants, to prevent herpes outbreaks since we all, pretty much, are infected with at least one of those diseases. The early AIDS victims (early 80’s) often had monster herpes outbreaks, so much so that the doctors thought, at the time, they had a new strain of herpes. They didn’t. The patients had HIV.

Now, in response to Alphagene…

  1. I have never claimed to be an expert and still don’t. Alphagene claims to have a level of expertise which permits pontificating in this field of inquiry. Alphagene’s pontificating has as much impact on me as the Pope’s statements on religion to a non-RC (and maybe some RC); there are things I agree with and things I disagree with. Unlike religion, however, we are discussing an issue that can be supported (seldom proved) or disproved by examining observed phenomena. That’s how science works.

Incidently, Alphagene would attack my education, yet he listed none on his side. I do not believe that working in the field and/or knowing intelligent people imparts education. Completing prescribed courses of study, being tested and subsequently being recognized for that effort, when successful, does.

I am not asking anyone to take me as an expert, after all, this is the internet!

Further, since the title of this thread is “killing viruses,” I have to admit that discussing Alphagene’s or my education and experience is somewhat off subject.

  1. I made one substantive assertion in my original post, around which I said some other things. That substantive assertion is that the immune system cannot see or destroy a “free virus,” no matter how many vaccinations one might receive. Specifically, I said that at least one host cell must die in order to defeat a viral infection. My initial support for this is Cecil’s own statement made in the original column.

Since I named this thread and initiated it in order to clarify Cecil’s column or to eradicate my own ignorance, I do have the right to say what is on subject and what is off. Alphagene’s original responses were “wrong.” I could have shouted “right” back, but I haven’t - I have suggested several phenomena that appear to invalidate Alphagene’s hypothesis and, of course, support my original contention.

  1. My understanding of the way the immune system deals with viruses is that once the virus infects a cell and the cell loses its “self-marker” (whatever that might be - it doesn’t matter for the discussion and it doesn’t matter how long it takes) the immune system kills the infected cell (while the time it may take is important in successfully combating the infection, it doesn’t affect my assertion) and the virus within it, then cleans up the dead debris (how doesn’t matter here). Many of the symptoms of viral infection are simply the result of the immune system killing infected cells (rashes, blisters, runny noses, etc.)

Where the immune system is not successful in defeating the infection and the symptoms don’t kill the host, the problem is the loss to the body of the functions that the infected cells were responsible for (talk about “denial of service”!). This is the problem with AIDS as the virus is depriving the body of the use of T-cells meaning that other diseases (the “opportunistic diseases”) become active and serious. With herpes, it means the skin cells are not being replaced and infection will get through that barrier.

  1. I am not trying to reach agreement. Agreement in science delays truth. I want to be less ignorant. While I give Alphagene no credit for his pitifully inadequate experience and education achieved from rubbing shoulders, (s)he may be right about some of the assertions. I want them tested. If they hold up, great, if they don’t, we all just keep on truckin’.

  2. I apologize to others who feel I am being too harsh or confrontational. Similar to having no desire to reach agreement, I have no desire to make any friends here. I merely want to investigate an issue among inquiring minds. I react negatively to blowhards (defined by me as one who pontificates http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=blowhard).

Unfortunately, Alphagene seems to believe that belittling somehow helps the cause of eradicating ignorance. Instead of dealing with viruses, (s)he wants to analyze my ego. Just as Alphagene’s petite experience is inconsequential to this discussion, my ego also has nothing to do with it.

(S)He states that I am confused by Candida and that (s)he was responsible for that confusion. Maybe I am confused by Candida. I may also be confused by religious hypocrisy and political indifference to suffering, but, like Candida, they are outside the range of a thread titled “killing viruses.”.

I will point out one more time that any education or experience I may have in immunology is not pertinent, since I am not claiming to be an expert. I am merely interested.

Alphagene did ask where I got my explanation of viruses. While I don’t feel that information is pertinent to the discussion, one of the major sources for my position that free viruses cannot be seen by the immune system is the CDC (referred to on several occasions). I don’t really trust their public statements, although I do agree with this position - but agreement is not science, as mentioned earlier.

  1. Anyone interested in AIDS should link to http://www.hopkins-aids.edu/hiv_lifecycle/index_fram.html. This shows an animated life cycle of the HIV and the specific points where chemical assaults are being tried. It does not disagrees with my hypothesis (i.e., my hypothesis may still be either right or wrong). I think it disproves Alphagene’s hypothesis since it never mentions antibodies killing free virus as a possibility for scientific development. Of course, maybe Johns Hopkins is biased.

Similarly, we know that we humans do create antibodies for Herpes Types I, II and chicken pox, yet, the method of dealing with these herpes infections is not to create more antibodies, but to chemically interfere with the ability of the herpes virus to reproduce within an infected cell (acyclovir).

  1. So, Alphagene, in a non-immunocompromised person, why don’t our antibodies kill all of the CMV and KS (Kaposi’s Sarcoma) virus? Please don’t tell me that it is the same situation as Candida. I have already expressed ignorance about Candida and pointedly told you that I don’t want to know about candida.

Similarly, why don’t our antibodies kill the free herpes virus in between the nerve cell and the epithelial cell or immediately when the new generation of viruses leave the infected cell?

Please explain these phenomena and, if available, use links to accepted experts on the internet so that we can all see your support. Please don’t tell me how great you are and list your pedigree or question mine; these are just not pertinent. Also, please stop saying things like “correct” or “wrong.” I am asking only for your opinions and I am not interested in a shouting match.

I am sincerely interested in being able to judge your hypothesis based on how it explains these phenomena.

P.s If you have some phenomena to test my hypothesis with, I would be glad to consider them the best I can.

No you don’t. This is the Straight Dope - once you toss out your idea, it’s up to the Teeming Masses to decide where the conversation will go. You can try to influence it by your subsequent contributions, but the Masses can say what they want. If the conversation develops away from your original posting, so what? You might find it’s more interesting, anyway.

**

If we aren’t dealing with chicken pox by creating more antibodies, if you can just use acyclovir, why all the pressure to come up with a chicken pox vaccine? Doesn’t a vaccine work by creating antibodies?

Or is it just the “safety first” PC climate we live in?

So, four years of experience in the field of molecular virology is insufficient to know what the currently accepted scientific theories are? Now we need a graduate degree to tell you what the textbooks say? Isn’t Majormd a an expert in this field (I can’t recall her specialty offhand)? Too bad she’s not around here anymore. And JillGat is pretty well studied in this field as well, is she not? Maybe she’d be able to back Alphagene’s claims up.

Yuck, virology is not a matter of opinions. There are correct and incorrect theories. You are trying to get Alphagene prove his theory by having him demonstrate that it holds for every phenomenon you can think up. I doubt that he has the time to do so, so he has tried to explain that it is currently accepted as true by experts in the field. You seem to think that he is unqualified to do so, and won’t listen to logic.

In short, you are assuming that your own theory is correct and that the bulk of the experts in the field are either wrong, or Alphagene hasn’t happened upon basic theory in four years of working in the filed. You then propose to have Alphagene disprove your theory without mentioning anything you are uncomfortable with. Around here we generally expect the person with their own theory to explain why it is better than the current theories. That’s the way it works around here.

Hey waterj2, yeh, science is funny that way. A scientific law (I think Alphagene used the word “dogma,” but this is what (s)he meant, isn’t it?) applies to all phenomena within its domain. I guess they don’t tell you that in poli sci, huh?

Does 4 years looks like a lot of experience from where you are? Tell me, how will you feel about people who think that a few years of killing defenseless pets is equal to your degree after you have your immunology degree, assuming it’s in immunology?

Even in Teddy’s domain, it will be a long time before 25-year scrub nurses get paid as well as first-year board-qualified neurosurgeons. And, the nurse will still be blamed for forgetting sponges. It’s just not fair!

BTW, DDG, I was going to get to this later, as I am doing the work (getting internet links) I hoped Alphagen would lead us to and can’t post again for a while. Will bore the “H” out of everyone soon with many links. Apparently my concern with HIV and Herpes has led me a little off the center just as Alphagene’s concern with Flu has him (her).

The chicken pox immunization is for before you get it, hopefully preventing it. Acyclovir is for after. Acyclovir does little to nothing without an active infection. Many people with Herpes II take it regularly anticipating active infections. Being a non-expert, I have no idea if the chicken pox immunization sets you up for shingles later, but, presumably it doesn’t.

P.s. waterj2, I am pretty sure you are not in a science program, otherwise you wouldn’t have said that “there are correct and incorrect theories.” In biology, there is only one kind of theory; the one that has not yet been disproved. Once disproved, it is nothing. Unfortunately, there is little that can be proved in biology, so most ideas remain theories. Newton made the right decision when he fell into physics.

Also, I am pretty sure you are not in a math program, since logic does not require authority nor qualifications. One doesn’t “listen” to logic, one uses logic. I would like Alphagene to speak logically. Apparently, (s)he only knows how to rant and rave about his(her) qualifications. Did (s)he also go to school in Boston?

Apparently you also are not in an English program, since I pretty clearly said I do not know whether my theory is right or wrong. My exact words in paragraph 4 were “(s)he may be right about some of the assertions.” I submitted the ideas here hoping to get some pertinent (and maybe some funny also) feedback. And, if you carefully examine what Alphagene has left out, you will see that I have demonstrated errors in what (s)he said.

Read the whole thread. I made one assertion (repeated in #2, para 1) attributed to Cecil’s own column. I claimed that the immune system cannot defeat a viral infection without at least one host cell dying. Alphagene complained, perhaps correctly, that I used Cecil’s statement out of context. I don’t think I did. What do you think?

Finally, having done some homework (see my comments to DDG) I have discovered that at least one of Alphagene’s assertions was probably demonstrably correct. Interestingly, if (s)he had thought about that rather than huffing and puffing, I wouldn’t have to wait five minutes for this thread to load and I would be less ignorant (course, I already am since I did the research and know the answer and I did it without ever relying on my fantastic pedigree) or wasting bandwidth on it.

Yuck seems to be hung up on the idea of killing pets though. Like that’s a requirement for being a virologist.

Further proof of his ignorance I guess.

Thanks for that laugh, Yuck. I needed it today.

Almost as funny was :

Dear Kettle:

You’re black!

Love, Pot

Yuck, you remind me greatly of an old acquaintance by name of Ken. You wouldn’t be him by any chance, would you?

I didn’t realize Jonathan Kaczinski still had access to a computer.

Um–Ted Kaczynski?

(Arnold, isn’t it about time to move this puppy to the Pit?)

Well DDG is bored, so I guess I will call it quits. And…just when anonymity was about to fall - Andros, you may not be very PC, but you are right, I’m black and my name is Ken. This could have been a great opportunity to teach the scientific method - Andros has a theory that I am his acquaintance. So far the phenomena support him. Oh well.

The links I came up with that pretty much put expert authority around these issues are these:
http://cumicro2.cpmc.columbia.edu/PICO/Chapters/Cellular.html

http://www.roche-hiv.com/infoactive/lifecycle/flash/main.html

http://www.epidemic.org/theFacts/hepatitisC/lifeCycle.html

http://www.globalserve.net/~harlequin/HBV/hbvcycle.htm

http://www.herpeszone.com/GENINFO.HTM

http://www.thebody.com/step/immune.html

I was going to summarize them and get more, but, heck, you guys can read, right?

Bottom line is this; Alphagene was partially right and I am less ignorant.

Bill will appreciate it, so buy, guys!

umm, yeah. heh. not sure what orifice the name “Jonathan” came out of. ::watches in horror while lame attempt at comedy becomes tragically disfigured::

swear to god, though, that rhetorical style is frighteningly similar.

Yuck, he wasn’t calling you literally black, as in African American.
Ever hear the saying “Well that’s the pot calling the kettle black.”?
If not, I’m not going to explain it to you.

And I’m almost certain you’re not the Ken I’m thinking of. Fortunately.

Quite the coincidence, tho, innit?

I like Lucy van Pelt’s approach to killing viruses (before she specialised in psychiatry).

She would have the subject lie prone on the sidewalk and cough vigourously. She would stand at their heads and ferociously stamp on all the germs that they coughed out.