Maybe, to begin with, because there wasn’t “terrorist” anything in Iraq before we came along?
But anyway, I’m sure being liberated comforts the Iraqi people as they walk past the rubble that used to be their schools, the barricades and no-go zones that have turned their cities into a war zone, and the places where their children, husbands, sisters and parents have died for a “liberation” they never asked for.
Do you mean the president of '88 -'92 or the incomptent torturing jackass who’s untrue statements murdered hundreds of thousands and caused trillions in debt?
If they’re good people I expect them to be quite pleased when the torturer dies. Good riddance to dead sources of crimes against humanity.
No, there was the terror of an oppressive police-state government in Iraq before we came along. They didn’t need guerrilla operations when they and their type were actually in charge.
Whether they’re happy about it or upset about it, the actual liberation was a success. They lived under an oppressive dictator before, and they no longer do.
Although I should add Carter appears to be aiming less at true feelings and more at keeping diplimatic channels open. The key phrase is “looking forward to another visit to [North Korea]”. I’m okay with that if he thinks he can do some good for the world through diplomacy
There was recently an interesting article on the BBC news site about information coming out of North Korea. A few relevant quotes:
Again, North Korea is not the same place it was ten years ago (this doesn’t mean I think it is good, just different) and simplistic analysis isn’t appropriate. “Whoah, bizarre crazy nation run by madmen! Everyone is uniformly deprived and starving except the one crazy guy! Pyongyang is creepy Whoah!” makes for a good Cracked.com article, but misses that North Korea is a living, changing, complicated nation with it’s own (very different, but still very relevent) political economy. Creating US foreign policy based on the Cracked.com version is a bad, bad idea.
Well, there is acknowledging reality and there is creating policy based on reality. You keep suggesting that we not think of the leadership of North Korea as “madmen,” but you seem to gloss over the question of whether we should think of them as autocratic, repressive, brutal, violent, misogynistic, militaristic, lying, and dangerous.
I mean, when you read stuff that Kim Jong Il was credited with having five holes in one his first time playing golf, or the myth that he didn’t urinate, or the true story that he bought giant rabbits from a German fellow to address the hunger problem in his country but then ate the first shipment of those rabbits for his birthday, are you REALLY so open minded that the word “a little off-kilter” cannot be reasonably and judiciously applied to the DPRK?
That doesn’t mean our diplomats must address the General Assembly and begin their remarks on the latest IAEA report with “Kim Jong Un U daddy so KRAAAZY!!1!” Do you really not allow yourself to think that North Korea is, well, weird?
Again, that’s satirical, but it’s hardly less bizarre than the real-life supernatural reports by North Korean media of his death’s aftermath. In addition to that BBC piece, I’ve heard that owls are weeping openly in the daytime and that a mysterious white bird has been seen brushing snow off of Kim’s statue.
Well, of course. North Koreans do not really seem to believe in Marxist ideology any more . . . They have not even the historical dialectic to believe in . . . But all traditional religion is suppressed . . . Skeptical humanism ain’t gonna fly, there’s too much skepticism in it . . . What have they got left to be God, but the Leader?
The funeral continues (it will last two days), and a “national memorial service segment” has just begun. Not sure how that differs from the rest of the funeral. A Western commentator on BBC mentioned that every resident of Pyongyang is hand-picked to live there.
BBC says " UN offices around the world lowered their flags to half-mast," which “had been requested by Pyongyang’s UN mission but was part of normal protocol for the funeral of any head of state.”
How long before some RW talking-head tries to make something of that, I wonder . . .
I don’t think I’ve seen too many heads of state at the funeral. More like zero from what I can tell. I was sort of hoping to catch Hillary Clinton wailing and throwing herself onto Kim’s coffin.