Some of Beck’s late night OPs require … more interpretation … than others. But I believe that’s what she meant. I stated it as a question because I wasn’t certain. The fact so many other people thought she was talking about fonts suggests the OP text was not a paragon of clarity.
Not so distinguishable if it is right next to a “1” in our domain name. I got into the habit of making the “l” a capital “L” just to make sure that people read it as “L” and “1” and not “1” and “1”. That mistake was common until I made that adjustment.
What my keyboard appears like and what you see on your screen are never gonna know if I poke I,l or l. Your screen will show your own font.
It would be “too my liking” to type in an easier way “for my comfort” on my keyboard.
It would not change your experience at all. I, I and I would all look the same to you.
Umm, haven’t been typing 30 years on a computer keyboard.
It is not nutty, rather an important observation, that due to various technical and historical reasons a lot of space is saved on everyone’s computer keyboards. О — is that an oh, an omicron, or possibly a zero? I’ll bet your keyboard does not have different buttons for all three.
Right now Unicode contains ~155,000 defined characters. Even with the false simplifying assumption that they all come in upper & lower case, that’s still 78,000 buttons with a shift key.
So no, everything can’t be on a single keyboard. For typing US English, uppercase Oh, lowercase oh, and zero are useful. Omicron much less so. Or even ö despite the fact it appears occasionally in high-register modern English. And Oh, oh, and zero are usefully distinguished when communicating with either a computer program or with a human.
Likewise with the various e.g. Chinese, Hebrew, & Arabic characters. There sure are humans that use them all day every day, and have them on their keyboards. Just not you, me, or the OP.
I interpreted her notion as being that she wanted be able to use lowercase ell as representing any of lowercase ell, uppercase eye, and numeral one. And fonts should display them similarly enough that any human reader would recognize that the lowercase ell glyph can represent any of those three characters. And it was up to the human reader to supply the correct interpretation of the ambiguous-by-design glyph. All because she did not want to have to learn to type a one when she meant one, or an uppercase eye when she meant uppercase eye. Instead … her fingers knew lowercase ell and that was that; change the world to match.
The historical record is interesting. But is not license to seriously ask for silly things.
My bottom line:
It’s a fun topic if we’re all joking to each other. I’m just not sure everyone here is joking.
I, too, once had one of those cheap typewriters with only 2–9 on it, because l = 1 and 0 = O, but I imagine that was just because it was cheap, not any sort of standard.
I’m not all that married to my needs and wants on this subject.
I was just sayin’.
Once in a persons Iife you oughta get that 1 peevey thing you hate, addressed, corrected and to your Iiking. Just once.
(BTW, aII the eIIs in this post are actuaIIy uppercase eyes)
P.S. aII that crap you were talking about coding and some fancy computer characters mean actuaIIy nothing to me, you are talking to the dirt trying to explain that stuff.
Where did you see all of that stuff on one page?? 『 is a Japanese [double] quotation mark, ¡ is a Spanish exclamation mark, ï is just an i with diaeresis (or it could have been a Turkish vowel, or a bunch of other things), and į is an i with ogonek (so you were reading, what, Lithuanian?)
Buy a programmable keyboard, remap I, l and 1 to a single key (you’ll likely need to make one a Shift function and one a Fn function). Now you have a keyboard with all three on one key. Your request of a lifetime is fulfilled.
I think we need more keys on the keyboard. Bring back Ð, Þ, Æ, Œ and Ƿ, I say. Œ (Ethel) and Æ (Ash) are not long departed from academic English, so it would be like they only stepped out for a moment.