Ditto to what everyone else said.
One addition, though: large hands and feet on a guy make my own hands and feet look petite and feminine by comparison. That’s always nice.
I look at mens’ hands and forearms a lot–I just love good hands and forearms. And I used to work in an outdoor store fitting hiking boots, sandals, etc, so I got up close and personal with a lot of feet. But I never really thought about the size correlation.
But when I was in college, a rumor went around that the shape of a guy’s thumb was similar to the shape of his wedding tackle ( 
). I don’t know if it’s true, but we spent a lot of time during boring classes looking at thumbs.
Does that mean a circumcised man would have no thumb cuticle either?