"Leon: The Professional"? Wha-?

“The Professional” is one of my favorite movies. I hadn’t seen it in about ten years. I noticed it was in my Netflix queue, so even though I own the movie, I threw caution to the wind and said, “Heck with it! I’m going to watch it through Netflix! Damn the torpedoes!”

After I was done watching it, I contemplated my new feelings about it. Watching it now, with more mature eyes, I saw new things in new ways.

Sidebar: The same thing happened to me with rewatching “Pulp Fiction” not too long ago after not having seen it for about a decade. I found it to less exciting and more depraved than I remember.

I realized I was more experiencing it from Leon’s perspective now, than Matilda’s perspective – as I was the previous times I watched it. Instead of watching it from the perspective of a headstrong young person, I was experiencing it from the perspective of a protective adult. So, it seemed much more fragile to me this time around. Instead of exciting, it was nerve-wracking.

But, still a very good movie. Holds up well. The first difference that I noticed, though, was that now the title is officially: “Leon: The Professional”. Eh. Whatevs.

So, after I was done watching it, I decided to go onto the messageboards at IMDB to see what all the Youngins’ were saying about it. Much to my surprise, they were talking about a completely different movie than I remember, or had just watched. They kept talking about scenes that are not in the movie. Come to find out, about a decade ago, the director’s cut came out, which added three more scenes, and about 20 minutes to the film. Some of the posters were lamenting about the stupid theatrical release, and how tame it was, and how it was the declawed version of the director’s cut.

I had no idea that a director’s cut of the movie had come out, and I guess the director’s cut is now the default version of movie – much like what happened to “The Abyss”. The Millennials are experiencing a completely different movie than I did.

Sidebar: Someone needs to collate a list of 90s movies that are absolutely essential for Millennials to watch.

These three scenes, I found them on YouTube, and I watched them:

Scene 1: This is a training scene. And, it is disturbing. Leon is taking Matilda through apartment buildings, and training her on how to infiltrate residences. Essentially, how to do a home invasion. It’s a montage of Matilda putting her chewing gum over the peep-holes of apartment doors, and then ringing the doorbell. When someone answers, and the door opens just enough for the security chain to extend, Leon reaches in with bolt-cutters and cuts the chain. But, then you don’t see what happens next. Just chewing gum on peep-hole, ring doorbell, surprised face opens the door, Leon with bolt-cutters. It’s about five seconds long, and they do it over and over and over again. I lost count, but about a dozen times in quick succession.

The scene was silly, and lost me within 30 seconds. It was also vicious, as you did not see what happened after Leon cut the security chain, and it was left it to your imagination. But, it also seemed very fantastical that they would just be walking around doing this.

But, then it turned dark. Very dark. They come to a door. Matilda places her chewing gum over the peep-hole, and then quizzically states that there is no doorbell. Leon tells her to knock. Matilda knocks. A male voice comes from the other side, yelling, “Who’s there?!” Matilda comes up with some ruse. “Uh. I’m looking for Mr. Ruben’s apartment. The lights are off, and it’s dark out here, and I can’t find the apartment.”

Leon hears the sounds of a firearm being cocked from inside the apartment. He grabs Matilda away from the front of the door just as whoever is on the other side opens fire. Bullets come tearing through the door. The man from within is firing, and yelling something very aggressively.

Leon says, “Here’s the ‘ring trick’.” He pulls a grenade out, pulls the pin, and throws it into the apartment. The apartment door explodes outward, and Leon and Matilda walk away.

WTF? This scene turns the movie into “Natural Born Killers”.

Scene 2: What remained of this scene in the theatrical release was only a sliver compared to what was cut out. The remaining scene was so short, you probably don’t even remember it. Matilda is angry at Leon, so while Leon is out working, she tells the hotel concierge that Leon is her lover. Leon goes out and buys her a pink dress and delivers it to her in a paper bag. Next thing you know, they move to a different hotel. When they get there, Matilda is still pouting. That’s the scene you remember.

The rest of it was cut out. At the new hotel, Leon is sitting languidly at the living room table. Matilda isn’t pouty anymore, and she comes out in the new pink dress that Leon just bought her. She asks Leon if he likes it. He says that he does. She insists, “Do you like it?” Leon says that he does. “Say it,” she insists. Leon says that he likes it.

Then, we have several minutes of conversation. Matilda talks about losing her virginity. I’m not sure if she was lying, but she says that the first time, no one likes it. Her first time, she did it just for attention, and she did not like it, either. But, she kept doing it, and she ended up liking it. She is sitting very close to him, trying to seduce him.

Leon takes over the conversation and talks about why and how he came to the US. We heard a little bit about this through Tony. Leon states that he was 19 years old, and over it Italy. He was in love with a girl, and she loved him, too. But, her family did not approve of Leon. So, they met secretly. Her family found out, and a male relative of the girl shot her in the head. He was released from jail two days later, having claimed it was an accident. As retribution, Leon shot that relative in the head, and then immediately boarded a ship to the US. He met up with his father, who was already working for Tony, and he’s been working for Tony ever since.

It ends with then curling up in bed togethe to sleep.

This scene is horrible, too. We understand that this relationship that Leon and Matilda have is not appropriate, but it is also definitely platonic. We understand that from the immature brain of a 12-year old girl, with the experiences that she has had, Matilda thinks this is what love is. We understand that Leon is reluctantly filling a hole in his life with an inappropriately young girl. We understand, as an audience, the facets here. This relationship is well established in other scenes, all throughout the movie. We don’t need the pedophilia rammed down us. Just in my opinion.

Also, it’s better to know that Leon had a tragic past, and now is all alone, and has been for some time, as we have discerned from Tony and from watching Leon. With all this new knowledge about his lover’s family killing her, and then Leon coming to the US to meet up with his father…it was unnecessarily extravagant. In my opinion.

The weird thing about this scene is that, and I realized it immediately, is that in the theatrical release, the entire movie takes place during the day. This scene, though, takes place at night. For some reason, not seeing sunlight in this scene makes it all the more creepy and dark – and not in a good way.

Scene 3: This is much shorter, and much more enjoyable. Leon and Matilda are out at a fancy restaurant. They are celebrating because, apparently, Matilda had her first “job”, and it went well with the “client”. They are joking around a little, but Matilda starts to get a little out of control, and it makes Leon uncomfortable.

Matilda starts drinking champagne, and gets immediately tipsy, and starts laughing loudly for several seconds. She almost gets hysterical, all while Leon looks like he wants to melt into the carpet.

It’s funny. It’s cute. It’s endearing. It shows a glimmer of optimism, and definitely builds the characters. This scene should not have been cut out.

Now I have to go find this director’s cut, and watch the whole thing from beginning to end.

I watched this movie, too, not too long ago. (I love Netflix). I liked it, on the whole. Some of it is pretty horrible, like the death of her little brother, but it is a good movie. I hope Matilda grew up OK.

I didn’t care for the extended version. It gives a little more depth on the characters, to be sure, and it further develops the relationship between the two (which is presumably why they were cut.) But, the film is a perfect horrifying little revenge tale as it was originally released. The new scenes, on the whole, are lighter in tone than the rest of the film, with some quirky humorous bits that, to me, clash with everything else. Maybe if the ratio of grimdark to bumbling fool + sidekick was more even, and devoted equal attention to the revenge story and the disturbing romance story, it wouldn’t bother me. But at a ratio of 9:1, it doesn’t work as well as the original film did.

I like that the extended version exists, since if you like the film it’s nice to be able to get a few peeks into the greater story, but I think that anyone who sees it first is actually getting a worse experience than if they saw the shorter version. I think that the rise in its popularity over the original is more just because people dislike the censorship that lead to the creation of the shorter version. Which is fair, but as said, I think that there was an unintended side-effect of that censorship which created a more focused and coherent whole.

The extra scenes sound terrible, so I won’t be seeking out the director’s cut.

I think the idea of a “90s movies for Millenials” thread sounds awesome though.

I haven’t seen the movie for while, but one thing that struck me when I saw it, way back when, was how very French - and by extension, non-American - the film was, to the point of cognitive dissonance. It’s not just that Besson has no ear for English, it’s a whole array of attitudes and cultural nuances that felt utterly incompatible with the language spoken. If I were watching the film at night with the sound off and subtitles on, and if I were unfamiliar with the cast, I would have assumed, without a shadow of a doubt, that the film was shot and set in Paris rather than New York.

It was very strange to me, although I guess that to some, that may be part of the film’s appeal.

Wow, the pin blows up the apartment? That is a neat trick.

It was released as just “Leon” in quite a few territories, including the UK, so I suppose they’ve just smooshed the two names together.

But yes, it’s a great film I think, and I agree that some of the scenes in the longer version really change the tone, and not for the better. The original remains a favourite.

Besson wrote a script for a sequel, but it has never been anywhere near production, so I just prefer to think that Matilda went on to have a great life.

Both Leon and Matilda are, in their own ways, strangers in a strange land, so that dissonance worked really well for me.

It morphed into Colombiana when Natalie Portman passed on reprising the role.

If you want to feel even more uncomfortable, check out #1 on this page to see where Besson originally wanted things to go…

We showed this film at the art house where I worked, so I got to see it several times during its first run. I remember being fantastically impressed with Natalie Portman, who was unknown to audiences at the time, and really was just 12 when the film was made.

Those missing scenes really change the tone.

We know Leon is messed up, but he seems to exist in the real world. He also seems to only do mob work - he doesn’t as a matter of course go after civilians. He has a “code”.

If all of a sudden we see him routinely make apartment invasions, it makes him much less a sympathetic character. More of a scumbag, actually.

Factor in the fact that one of the apartment dwellers shoots through a door without any justification, and Leon uses a hand grenade to kill him without any repercussions, and we’ve entered the surreal world of The Crow, not real world NYC.

THIS is why I don’t like the idea of “the cloud”. Movies can change without warning. At least I have a DVD. I’ll stick to my original version -The Professional. Leon may be damaged, and teaching a 12 year old to be a stone killer probably isn’t good, but at least he’s not a kiddie-diddler.

I’ve literally never seen the movie without those “extra” scenes and didn’t know there was a version that didn’t have them.

I’m a Millennial, what exactly do you want to discuss with me relating to 90s movies?

The 90s was a very good decade for movies. The only other decade that can even give it competition is the 70s. Keep in mind that my generation grew up with VCRs, and later DVDs and the internet. So while I was a little young to see great 90s films like Goodfellas, Clueless, or Braveheart in theaters, I watched them all on home video when I was a teenager.

I loved Leon: The Professional, both the original and the directors cut.

From what I recall the original script had a sex scene, but Matilda was a bit older, like 15. Natalie Portman auditioned and they liked her, so they cut it out.

The version I heard, Besson wanted to keep the sex scene anyway, but Portman’s parents put their foot down. Thank heavens.

The way I see it, Luc Besson is absolutely terrible at everything about directing except casting, which he’s great at. And sometimes, he manages to cast actors talented enough that they know when to ignore him (which is almost always) and to direct themselves, in which case you can get a great film like this one.

Have you seen The Big Blue ?

No, I haven’t. Which part of my statement does it refute?

That he is terrible at the non-casting parts of directing. It is a visually amazing film (the French version, not the cut-for-America pap version).

This probably isn’t required for this thread but just in case, spoilers ahead!

I didn’t watch Leon until last night on Amazon Prime despite being a huge Portman fan. I didn’t realize there was a longer version and AP only has the shorter one. I really liked it but there were a couple of scenes that I found jarring. While poking around YouTube I learned that there is a version that’s 50 minutes longer–the full cut–so I watched it again. According to Wiki Besson cut out the scenes that created awkwardness at a LA test screening. I find the longer version a lot better and it smooths out the jarring scenes.

Part of what makes Leon compelling is the sexual tension between the two and the added scenes fleshes (heh) that out a little bit. It also shows Mathilda getting more training (which leads to the darkly humorous scene of Mathilda shooting the “client” with fake bullets). In the shorter cut it doesn’t make much sense that she’d go after Stansfield but in the longer one we know she’s been trained for it.

I’m not sure if you’ve interpreted that scene correctly. I believe she’s still a virgin; she mentions reading the line from her sister’s magazine and that it’s her friends who have had sex (to show off) and didn’t like it. She wants to have sex with Leon because that’s what she thinks love is and she says “I want to like it my first time”. The only “caring” she saw in her prior life was when her father had sex with Mathilda’s (step-?) mother so that’s all she knows. In the shorter version it’s wasn’t apparent (to me) that Mathilda was confusing love and sex.

Leon (rightly) refuses and gives his soliloquy although part of his refusal is “I wouldn’t be a good lover” (and there’s no way I’d share a bed with a young Natalie Portman intent on seducing me). But it seems that Mathilda is really more interested in being held than actually having sex; at least that’s how I interpreted Mathilda draping Leon’s arm around her. The next morning Leon seems more excited about having sleept in a bed than with Mathilda; meanwhile she seems happy about the arrangement instead of feeling rejected. [Or maybe I just really like the movie and am trying to come up with excuses for why Leon isn’t a pedo. :wink: ] It’s probably good, though, that Leon dies at the end because otherwise we’d have to decide if his final “I love you Mathilda” is paternal or sexual.

Some other random thoughts:

[ul]
[li]I have to agree that “the ring trick” scene is over the top but it does set up the final death of Stansfield.[/li]
[li]I thought the scene with Mathilda begging for Leon to open the door to be amazing acting. It shows you how awful George Lucas is that he turned Portman into a wooden statue.[/li]
[li]According to IMDB trivia Portman’s parents were concerned about the smoking scenes. That seems an odd thing to worry about with Mathilda being an obscenity-spewing cleaner-in-training trying to have sex with a man 3x her age. [/li]
[li]What a dumb-ass spot to plant Leon’s plant. It’ll get trampled in no time. [/li]
[li]I have hope, though, that the head mistress is as tough and loving as she appeared and that maybe Mathilda ended up being happy. I’m glad they didn’t make another movie because you know she wouldn’t be happy.[/li]
[li]Lastly, the first night Mathilda spends with Leon he comes close to shooting her in his sleep. What’s up with that? Was he thinking that was how he could be rid of her? Seems rather drastic but I suppose he is a Hollywood hit man.[/li][/ul]