And your a fucking idiot, her husband was not the only person who stated that this was her wish or don’t you get that part.
So are you.
You know, if you’re not going to bother to educate yourself about this subject, then butt the fuck out.
According to him, and several other people, all of whom gave testimony leading a judge to declare that there was “clear and convincing evidence” that Terri would not want to go on like this.
Really, all of this has been asked and answered earlier in this thread and in others.
She wished to die by starvation? To bleed from her eyes and tongue, with her skin falling off? I doubt it.
You know her?
You answer is, yes, the wish that she expressed was not to be kept alive.
I’m sure, if she had any consciusness, she’d rather just be given a quick injection, but for some reason the current law prohibits this.
Fuck off, Guin. You don’t get to decide who posts in what subjects, let alone what their opinion is.
Why do we have to talk to your hand? Is it because your head is up your ass?
:wally
Take it off your dick, and then maybe we can have an intelligent conversation.
You’re expressing opinions that have no grounding in the facts (eg Michael Schiavo was responsible for deciding to end the feeding). When you do that, expect to be called a twat.
There you’ve just proved my point.
Enlighten us then. Who decided to end the feeding?
A guardian ad litem appointed by the courts who, after examining both sides, came to the conclusion that it was indeed Terri’s wish not to be kept on life support.
The Courts who were appointed to decide her wishes. I’m enlightening
you by the way. Everybody else has at least fucking bothered to get some background information before shooting their fucking mouths off.
Terri Schiavo by proxy.
She’s not on life support, they are denying her food and water.
A feeding tube, which must be inserted surgically IS considered “life support”, numb nuts. I think any doctor would tell you that.
I could swear you said on the last page that you know the facts of this case…
Just to be clear, you are happy with that? Starving human beings to death? But not feral cats, oh no.
Via a plastic tube connected to a pump that delivers a foodlike substance directly into her stomach (through her abdominal wall), and a plastic tube connected to a pump that delivers fluid directly into her veins.
Your idea of “life support” is probably limited to a ventilator, which is a plastic tube connected to a pump that delivers air directly into the lungs. These are all means of “life support”.
- It was her expressed wish
- She is not experiencing it anyway
- I would support the doctors being able to give her a lethal injection
So, answer the question - do you actually believe her to still retain consciousness? If so, how do you justify keeping her ‘alive’ in the state that she is in?