Let's Pit WalMart employees again

We’ve Pitted WalMart employees here before; they suckle at the teats of the Job-Creating Waltons, then turn around and suckle at the taxpayers’ teat, but read about the latest outrage – now they want their employer to pay for their uniforms. WalMart management has carefully reviewed their request (“We always want to hear from our associates, it makes us a better company”) and rejected it.

They complain that management keeps changing the dress-code, and it costs $50 to buy a new uniform. For heaven’s sake! First of all, WalMart does provide the WalMart-logo smock free of charge! … and gives the employee a standard discount for all Walmart goods. If the employee still doesn’t make enough to buy a simple uniform why doesn’t he have the gumption to get a better job?

Certainly we can’t blame WalMart for changing the dress-code frequently: with similar tired and frenzied looks, customers often have trouble distinguishing employees from other customers.

The idea that WalMart’s hardworking stockholders should pay for uniforms is absurd. WalMart’s annual profit is only $16.4 billion. If they bought each of 2.2 million employees just two $50 suits per year, and were unable to recoup this loss with higher prices or higher productivity, profits would plummet to $16.2 billion per year. Would that be fair to the hardworking stockholders?

Shame on WalMart employees. Go back to North Korea if you prefer communism.

I always thought it was odd that Walmart wont allow unions or does everything they can to keep unions out.

Am I being whooshed?
If Wal-Mart requires a uniform, then Wal-Mart can pay for the uniform. I will not join in and Pit the employees of Wal-Mart. Let’s Pit the owners.

Yes, the OP is pitting walmart’s management.

You have to look on the upside. All the employees buying new clothes at WalMart will boost their lagging sales figures.

Didn’t Henry Ford famously pay his workers a high enough wage to afford one of his cars? This is the same thing, WalMart pays their workers enough to buy shitty Chinese clothing, then forces them to buy it.

That’s what the employee is trying to do - at WalMart. If the employee is able to organize thousands of coworkers to bring an issue to management’s attention I suspect his “gumption” is not lacking.

Is sarcasm such a lost art? I thought the OP was lovely.

reads previously skipped last two paragraphs of OP
hangs head in shame

even I knew the OP was sarcastic :wink:
best part

it’s funny cos it’s true!

Yes, it was obvious that the OP was being sarcastic. Except for this:

That it is. I’ve been mistaken for a Walmart employee on numerous occasions.

Yeah, but considering how many Walmart employees qualify for - and need - government assistance like Medicaid and SNAP, they can’t even do THAT right!

They are referring to it as a “dress code,” rather than a uniform, to put the onus on the employee.

They are, however, providing vests to be worn over the appropriate “dress code” clothing. Vests that are made in Jordan, rather than in the US.

Heckuva job, Walmart.

I found the OP to be more ironic than sarcastic, but that’s just because I’m a pedantic jackass.

As a pedant myself, I found it to be both.

I wrote that it was MORE ironic than sarcastic, not that it was ironic RATHER than sarcastic.

You can borrow my Sarcasm-O-Meter. :slight_smile:

Right-wing rhetoric is so over-the-top, even here at SDMB, that I try to make my sarcasm unmistakable. But I guess right-wing rhetoric in post-rational America is no longer distinguishable from its own caricature. Sorry; my intent was not to Whooosh. (But right-wingers are so lonely at intelligent message-boards, it did seem generous to offer them some help. :stuck_out_tongue: )

I think I’ve been reprimanded before for facetious Pittings. No one’s used any cuss words yet, so Mods: Feel free to move this to IMHO if that’s a more appropriate forum.

Marked down to $29.99 this week only

nm