:Satori:
Oh, good grief. This more than anything explains the convergence of ideas in the Religious Right. Perhaps the primary idea is fatalism, & the religiosity & apparent social-darwinism are secondary to that & interpreted through that lens.
:Satori:
Oh, good grief. This more than anything explains the convergence of ideas in the Religious Right. Perhaps the primary idea is fatalism, & the religiosity & apparent social-darwinism are secondary to that & interpreted through that lens.
a steel bar 40" long, lying on the path.
The Libertarian kicks it without looking, it flies up, & his body hits it longways, striking himself from head to crotch. He blames his own bad luck.
The bar falls against the Randian, striking her across the belly & knocking the wind out of her. She flings it away, cursing the apelike proletariat that created this piece of the material culture & discarded it to strike her.
Its arc collides with the LaRouchian’s forehead & face, knocking him down, dazing him, & leaving a grand bruise. He “realizes” that the bar & the Randian are both fascists, & the Libertarian is their useful idiot.
Without consulting the internet, and in the face of my own ignorance, I have to ask: what in the bloody hell is so special about Atlas Shrugged? I am (shamefacedly) an English degree holder and have never read it. Should I? Is it in any way representative of the human condition?
What’s the Dope on this book?
(Sorry about the hijack, OP).
You don’t read romance novels, do you? It being a book doesn’t mean you have to read it, though I dare you to. I double-dog dare you. And I don’t mean that you get to read ten pages before you throw it across the room for the trash it is. You have to finish it.
Remember the crap the other kids in class wrote that they were convinced was both deep and well written? Expand it to book length and make the student a sociopath.
No, a Libertarian would say “If we had a real Free Market economy, somebody would have found a use for that steel and I wouldn’t have whacked myself in the face with it.”
As a former anarcho-capitalist disciple of Fang the Unwashed, I have to say that anyone who says that isn’t a real libertarian, but a muddle-headed believer in soft totalitarianism via chaos theory. Real liberty includes the liberty to be independent, ungoverned, useless, & unlucky.
Is this in Liberteria? Would the Libertarian sue the owner of the sidewalk (because there would be no public sidewalks in Liberteria, there’s no profit in it) for breach of contract and creating a hazard, or would he have to re-read the fine print of the contract he signed before paying the fee for using the sidewalk?