Well, i think Brown got exactly as much coverage as he was entitled to. 
I also note that Freedom2, that well known Brown supporter- (he is not a Bush supporter, oh no- he supports Brown) :rolleyes: has been posting on this thread a lot, and not very much on the Bush threads.
Well, I’m floored by the sheer weight of the evidence that you posted to support that assertion. I mean, how can I argue with statistics like that. Obviously the Libertarians were entitled to less coverage than Buchanan and Hagelin. And I’ll also make sure to inform Brown that he’s been misspelling his name everywhere I’ve seen it.
Just a minor nitpick, but I thought Harry was only on the ballot in 49 states because of the schism in the LP in Arizona. We were talking about this when Harry came to town for a fund-raiser. There was a Libertarian candidate on the ballot, but it wasn’t Harry. Can anyone confirm this?
More evidence of the “media Browne-out”: My mom was phone polled and the pollster asked her “If the election were held today, would you vote for Bush, Gore, Nader, or Buchanan?” My mom responded “What about Harry Browne?” and the pollster replied “Who?”. It made me want to cry.
Yes, Chief, you are correct. The LP in Arizona split from the main LP and nominated someone other than Harry Browne for the Presidental candidate.