Lies about Tea-Partiers?

I’m thinking of starting a septimus-bashing thread; if I do, I hope you guys can do better than that! :smiley:

I don’t know how obvious it was, but my question quoted here was more than slightly tongue-in-cheek. In the nearby thread Ill-fed Housepainter seems to be claiming that only a few deranged rednecks, in the Tea Party almost by accident, are capable of anything but sublime wisdom.

Assuming his comments are anything but twisted idiocy, these quotes had to be forged. But based on reactions in this thread it seems to indeed be true that many of America’s present politicians are indeed the worst kind of execrable filth, who deserve treatment whose description might be unfit even for BBQ Pit.

We all enjoy laughing about all this. Given the importance of America (with its economic and military might) to the future of mankind, I find all of this profoundly sad. It would incapacitate me if I weren’t able to tune it out. I’ve not visited North America for several years and would probably end up in a physical fight if I did visit and allowed myself to communicate with some of the natives.

Hell, go check out Free Republic sometime if you think this kind of thing is being exaggerated!

I note that the story described said nephew as “hunky, 6 foot 2.” I’m not exactly sure what journalistic relevance this has…

I went :eek: when I first read his name as Jeff Gannon.

You’ve never read the New York Post before, have you?

I think Prison Cum Dorm 4 was my favorite of the series.

Thanksgiving is going to be awkward this year.

May I suggest that no special effort is necessary? :wink:

Is this another example of how you never insult people till they insult you in a thread?

Well I guess he did say retarded, I can see how you took that as him talking about you.

I said I try to make it a practice not to insult people unless they insult me first.

All of those quotes are real. Michele Bachmann has said even stupider things than that. She can’t even spell her own first name correctly.

I see. You just don’t try very hard.

I try hard enough. I may lose track on rare occasion and insult someone who hasn’t insulted me first, but I think my track record is pretty damn good. Plus I’ll happily apologize if someone points out to me where I’ve done that.

Give SA a break. he has to defend the undefensible, he has to justify the unjustifiable and pretend the dingbats in the party are actually thinking caring people. It can not be easy.
He has to make peace with a group that backs O’Connell, Bachmann, Robinson, Angle, Paladino and many others. Poor guy has to spend a lot of time in fantasy land to get there.

The fact that I have no peace to make with any particualar group notwithstanding, are you suggesting that I should passively sit by while inaccurate or untrue statements are made about the Tea Party or Tea Party candidates simply because they may be in the wrong in other areas? I thought we were supposed to be fighting ignorance here.

Or are we supposed to just let it go unchallenged because it serves the ‘greater good’?

These are some pretty big areas.

Your track record on this board is shit.

Unless of course someone takes the time and effort to point out where you have done so, then you just accuse them of lying.

I heard rumors about Obama trying to impose Sharia law on America. Thank Allah, the Tea Baggers have come up with their own version.

Yep, all someone has to do is to prove that they haven’t insulted you, and you’ll be right there with that apology, lickety-split.

Thing is, there are number of tea party loons running for office who are saavy enough not to say everything that passes through their head, at least when they are in front of a microphone. Rand Paul set up a weird ophthalmologist trade group, because IIRC the idea that younger physicians would have to take continuing education while older physicians would not got his panties in a bunch. But post-primary he’s been quieter about his opposition to regulating BP more, or his desire to gut funding to public schools in favor of home schooling.

Ron Johnson, who may be the next Senator from Wisconsin, was a big opponent of the Wisconsin Child Victims Act. The act eliminated the statue of limitations for civil injury caused by an adult’s sexual contact with anybody under the age of 18. What scared Johnson is that the law could apply to organizations and companies as well as individuals – he thought there would be economic havoc. This is an odd position to take an absolutist position on, given that “as of 1997 28 states had adopted an extension of the time limitation based on “discovery” of child sexual abuse or its effects.” So where is the “economic havoc” that Ron Johnson fears? Now I can see proposing modifying language, but it seems to me that this is exactly the sort of legal structure that the Catholic Church et al should be subject to.

The Republican Party has become a coalition of cranks, crackpots, nuts, loons and their funders.