I think what The Master is saying is that skin is somewhat translucent … light rays penetrate down through the layers of cells a certain distance … blue light is more energetic than red light, so the blue light penetrates deeper into the skin … down at these deeper layers are the blood vessels and only the blue light gets that far, and still be able to reflect back out … all the red light will have been absorbed by then …
No, I don’t understand the literary allusion to Fruit Loops either, nor why milk is supposed to turn them different colors …
Not quite. The skin absorbs blue and green light much more strongly than red light, so it doesn’t penetrate nearly as deep. The color you see for the veins is due to scattered light, and this scattered light is much more likely to be red than blue (as the blue light is absorbed).
“One implication of the wavelength dependence of scatter is that blue and green light that has returned to the surface of the skin will have, on average, travelled less deeply than red light. This is considered the primary reason why blood vessels and pigmented nevi that are situated deeper within the skin are only able to absorb light from the red end of the spectrum and therefore appear bluer than their superficial equivalents”
Shorter wavelengths equal higher frequencies and higher energy. UV has shorter wavelengths than blue light, and X-rays even shorter wavelengths.
The blues are scattered (i.e. reflected) while the reds are absorbed.
The column explains, “milk [has] a similar ratio of fat, proteins, and water in emulsion as skin”. Thus, the optical properties are considered to be similar to skin. It has the same amount of scatter in the same wavelengths.