Like stupid and pompous idiots, who try to define and limit what art is.

It would be if you were any good at it.

:wink:

Terr, care to address post 588? To expand: better at what? How do you determine what is better? Who is judging what is better? What standard are you using to determine “better”?

To recap, we have determined that: art requires craftsmanship, crafstmanship requires expertness, and expertness requires one to be better than the majority of humans. I’m interested in the next step.

Sure. But first, define “expand”, “what”, “is”, “who”, “standard”, and “judging”.

Nice try, but you’re the one trying to establish that “craftsmanship” is somehow objective, despite not being able to demonstrate in what way it’s objective.

Hey I am just trying to figure out what your questions mean.

Define “define”.

I think Terr is deliberately trying to be a dickface.

Which I define as someone who behaves like Terr.

Therefore, Terr is deliberately trying to be Terr.

Which really is so very affected. Pretentious, even.