Not to argue with you, but I came up with a possible retort that the mom and daughter would say…
“Would I want this guy still breathing and angry (with even the slightest possibility of seeing daylight again) still on our minds, or would I rather live out the rest of my days knowing that he’ll never be in our lives again.” TheirMMV.
Fuck that punishment crap. Punishment is just prurient revenge. Put him out of everyone’s misery and be done with it. What a scumfuck psycho. I hope he gets raped in prison.
If a puppy also took a bullet for the child, then it’s be the Ultimate RO thread. And also, the bullet went through a kitten and then circumcised a pro-foreskin activist before hitting the puppy.
It first grazed the brain of the world’s foremost marketing advisor, leading to all stores playing Christmas music starting in May.
How the hell do you go from, “Punishment is just prurient revenge,” to “I hope he gets raped,” in only two sentences?
Ah, but if the police had used a taser on the perp while taking him into custody, it would be a totally different matter.
according to public records, some one with that last name and an alternate spelling of the first was on parole in De-troit for assorted violent crimes, picture seems to match the one in the news link. Haven’t a clue if mom knew his record, though. So, since he was on parole, yes, he did prison time.
Haha, that’s a really good question. I’ll have to examine that one. I guess I’d prefer him to just be eliminated, but the irrational angry side of me slipped one in underneath my nose. 
Aaaaaaaand, apparently, not enough! 
Thanks so much, wring, for the info.
Now, while I don’t *know * if the mother knew of his criminal past, I’m going to go out on a limb–albeit a short limb–and WAG that she could have known.
I won’t say why I think this is possible, as my flame-retardant suit…oh, never mind, but trust me, I have my reasons.
short limb indeed. Michigan has a public website that gave me the info, certainly she could have also checked.
If she had a computer, internet access, and no fear of interacting with the government, right?
simple access to an internet connected computer for about 2 minutes.
Where?
info sent
Got it, wring If you want you can post my reply.
Please note-- all is okay between me and wring
absolutely.
Maybe he could be eliminated VIA rape?
Thanks. I gotcha.
I was referring, though, to what I’ve seen and heard of in my travels: that there are women who will, for a variety of reasons–economic, psychological, whatever else–not only consort with known criminals or men of dubious moral fortitude, but also take them into their homes, expose their children to them, and, unfortunately, produce more children with them. How sad, and how stupid.
So, of course, I was wondering if this might be the case here. And I wouldn’t be surprised if it were. Note (for those who might misunderstand me) that I’m not saying that it is the case here, just that I wouldn’t be surprised.
P.S.–Not to ignore or dismiss, by the way, what I thought was **Darth Nader’s ** very reasonable point.
I initially read the title as ROI - return on investment.