Phrased this way, you’re taking it as a given that the assassination already happened, and you’re hoping to make the most of a bad situation. At least, that would be a generous reading.
I don’t see a way to read this prior post in the same way; and I’m leaving in the part where you specify you’re talking about billionaires, so hopefully you don’t accuse me of bad faith quote snipping.
That’s not “I hope the best can come out of this bad event”, that’s “these people need to be afraid until they change”. And YES, that’s an extreme position.
Maybe it’s what you meant, but it’s much milder than any way I can reasonably read the prior post. So I don’t buy that DemonTree is bad faith because she read it the same way I do.
You aren’t sure what you’re missing? What about the whole part of my post that came after:
I don’t agree with your statement any more than I agree with “It would be good if billionaires feared for their lives and it made them give me free ice cream”. If I could only answer in one word, I guess I’d have to say that yes, it would be a good thing. But in reality, the outcome of billionaires fearing for their lives would not be that they give me free ice cream. So in reality, I would not agree with the statement.
Nor do I agree with the prior assumption that seems inherent to the whole argument, that currently billionaires are simply ignoring all of society’s rules.