There was a legal analyst, I forget her name, on MSNBC this morning who dismissed the DNA evidence on the basis that (paraphrase) sure, DNA from 4 men was found in the her anus, vagina, pubic hair, and panties, but that does not mean it was a result of sexual activity. There could be another explanation. Furthermore, the lack of DNA from the accused students is not proof that there was no sexual activity on their part. :rolleyes:
She also flatly refused to answer the host’s questions concerning the (apparent) conspiracy between the lab and the DA to withhold excuplatory evidence.
Maybe this whole DNA thing ain’t what it is cracked up to be. Nifong publically stated that the DNA results would absolutely identify the perpetrators. Oh well.
She probably did shower and change, but that was before noon…
According to this evening’s news, Lying Whore had a baby today. Exactly nine months after the four different DNA types were found. Brings a whole new meaning to the term: Who’s Your Daddy.
As it turns out, the child is due in February. She checked into UNC Medical Center for pregancy related issues. A judge has ordered her to undergo paternity testing.
Bigger news is the revelation in court today that Nifong and Meehan, the director of DNA Security, agreed not to provide the reports of the DNA tests for the multiple males whose DNA *was *discovered. This raises the question of whether Nifong knew about the results when he went before the gand jury (almost certainly, he did), and whether he informed the grand jury of the findings.
What the fuck? No DNA from any of the accused players was found on the “victim,” but this judge thinks there is somehow a possibility that one of them impregnated her? How? Sperm telekinesis?
The defense attorneys requested it. My opinion is that they can feel their jaws closing around Nifong’s neck and they want to shake every bone in his body loose. They know their clients are innocent. They want to establish in the public eye that they are innocent. Another negative test will tend to support that, even if it haq no real bearing on the case.
Can this idiot Nifong be prosecuted for this? I’d love to see this guy pay for his crimes. Another point: the fact that the three stooges (AKA Jackson, Sharpton, Farrakan) didn’t show up, made me realize it was a big lie.
good point ralph124c- I think Sharpton didn’t want another Tawana Brawley, and I think Jackson just embarassed himself recently by defending Maurice Clarett.
My question is: knowing there is zero evidence, even if the idiot was successful in bringing the case to trial, is he so out of it to think any jury in the country short of the OJ jury, would convict without any proof?
I’m no lawyer, but I think that might be prosecutorial misconduct?
The thing that puzzles me though is… this baby is due in February? Even if the due date is put at February 1, and we assume that the sperm lived in the accuser for seven days before conception happened, that’d put the maximum last date of conception after the Duke Lacrosse party at March 21, right?
Now I’m also no doctor, but doesn’t human gestation last 40 weeks? March 21 to Feb 1 is, rounded to the nearest week, 46 weeks.
Bwuh? How could anyone who had sex with The Liar on March 14 2006 be the father of a baby due in February of 2007?
There is a school of thought that believes just that. And that thatis not all, by a long shot.
No one thinks that the lacrosse players are potential fathers. Nifong doesn’t think that the lacrosse players are potential fathers. He has stated as much. The defense attorneys are just getting their pound of flesh,as it were.
catsix, if you have the time, this blog is dense with information. The writer’s studiousness, persistence, and thirst for detail are superlative.
He might have a shot if there is no change of venue. Seriously. Although if it does come to trial, I cannot imagine that the accuser would show up. There is no way she wants to face those defense attorneys. If she refuses to testify, Nifong can shrug his shoulders and say that at least he tried.
