So my OP was not very well constructed. Whatever. I forget sometimes I am dealing with message board divas (not everyone, but if the shoe fits…)
At this point I could care less about the OP.
But Polycarp, back up your statement. I request either a cite or an apology, but expect neither.
You know, IRL, I can make my points and hold my own in most debates. Somehow that doesn’t translate well to posting on a message board. I would dare say that the personality and gravitas and boldness enjoyed by the most erudite of posters here does NOT translate into RL. They would either have no one who chose to be in their presence or have cauliflower ear.
But you know what? Many of you (not all, not all) are self righteous pricks. Self important demi-gods who have carved out a fifedom on a message board. You are petty and you never miss a chance at self aggrandizement or belittlement of others. I would say you are mean. I cannot imagine you try this IRL. Maybe you do.
I have not been here as long as you, but I do not see a lot of what you just claimed. I would change “Many of you” to “Some of you” for starters and I find most posters are nice, and most are more prone to tease than belittle except for in a few cases of extreme nuisance.
You seem to be very upset with a simple thread closure. Why? It would be so easy to start a new thread to make your point.
I do agree **Polycarp ** should back up his statement or apologize. That is only fair.
EddyTeddyFreddy: I have heard abasement is good for the soul but tough on the knees. How do you find it? What kind of horn do you play?
If the OP had been a bit clearer about the intended topic, the thread would not have been closed. It’s just not that big of a deal. (OMG did I just defend a mod’s actions?)
I guess I’m in the minority. I came to the original thread with no preconceived notions about the poster, read the thread, and understood. That’s likely because I agree, and it is how I would converse such a topic. I don’t necessarily agree that everything should always be spelled out on the page, but I know I’ve been doing it more often to try to head off misunderstandings. Given that I seem to be the only one who understood newscrasher’s post, he should have made more of an effort to make his point.
I came to the same impression you did, D_Odds, and I even briefly considered emailing Lynn to see if it could be reopened. But I found I didn’t really care enough to bother.
newcrasher, I recall a series of one-line news story summaries in OPs in Great Debates, which ended up going nowhere and were I think locked down after a while. Whoever did them never returned to them. If that was not you, as appears to be the case, then I do owe you an apology, and you have it, here and now. I regret accusing you of something which someone else did, whom your post made me think was you. It was inappropriate and you have my regrets.
You’re quite correct, if the OP had been clearer, I wouldn’t have locked that thread.
I tend to lock threads rather than move them because they’re generally not really suited for another forum. Since I had no way of telling what the OP was about, not being a mind reader, I chose the simplest path and locked the thread. I expect posters to put forth a little effort when starting a thread, I don’t think that just putting a few random observations is good enough. That goes for any forum of this board, by the way, not just the Pit.
Looked like a joke thread to me. Sure, it was sarcastic. It was also lame and uninteresting. Good call, Lynn.
I’ve noticed, reading your posts, that you’re a gigantic fucking moron. Maybe you should do what you can to remedy that situation. I’m not expecting much, but just maybe you can improve to the point of being simply useless.
Big words from the guy who took it upon himself to arrogantly proclaim he was the most famous doper. Whatever will we do without you to grace our presence. :rolleyes:
Ah, another “kick 'em while they’re down-er”. Ah well. the below quote is from the last post in the thread you reference. But I am glad you didn’t miss an opportunity to be rude or unkind to someone you have never met, and who has done very little to impact you negatively. I guess it is a kind of therapy for some. :rolleyes:
You know, if you expect people to be nice to you, maybe you should respond to those that are nice or neutral towards you and not just those that show hostility.
Many others and I are aware of the referenced thread and did not bother to comment about it. Call it water under the bridge if you like or consider that we accepted your apology.
Getting self righteous and cursing out people and make large accusations about the membership of the board is not only not a good way to get people to treat you seriously, but encourages those who like to get a rise out of people.
**Polycarp ** very honorably apologized to you and instead of accepting it, you respond to the person who came in just to bash you.
This was not terribly mature in my opinion.
The difference between you and me (well, one of the many differences,) is that I know I’m a self righteous prick. You claim a moral high ground when in fact you occupy the same gutter as the rest of us. In fact, you’re an even bigger guttersnipe - there’s three BBQ threads up on page 1 either started by you or about you.
IMO you look pretty silly up there on that cross you’ve nailed yourself to, but if that’s how you get your kicks, have fun.
Thank you Polycarp. I appreciate your consideration. I may be having what is known is scientific circles as a “bad day”. I apologize to you and everyone else for taking it out on this forum and its participants.
Sorry, this will sound condescending, but:
That is much better. Really, for some if not most of us, an apology raises the apologizers esteem in our eyes. It really does. It is not universal, but I think most people agree with me. I mean this as a positive statement and I hope you take it in kind.