Mad-Men: 7.14 "Person to Person", SERIES FINALE (open spoilers)

Assuming that the Coke campaign could have been cobbled together between November 1970 and February 1971, I find it more likely that happy-to-have-found-each-other Peggy and Stan were largely behind it, inasmuch as they’re still at McCann and Don isn’t.

Don may have contributed an idea or two in the brief time he was with them (I don’t remember in which episode Coke was first mentioned), but I can’t see him returning to NYC to take command of it. The commercials coincided (roughly) with his epiphany, but that’s all. They reflected the general mood of the country at the time.

I don’t even think he’d go back to be with the boys anytime soon, since Betty made it clear she didn’t want him interfering with the custody arrangements and Sally has pretty much taken over the household already.

I’m happy for those who were satisfied by the finale. But for me, it was just sad.

I think this episode is an excellent example of writing that could, most kindly, be described as ‘seat of the pants’:

*** “Okay, Peggy, Pete, Joan, and Roger: three of you will find True Love and happiness!—sorry if the partners you’ll get are fairly arbitrary and/or unlikely and/or picked out of a hat. But one of you will be alone, juggling childcare and business-startup-demands, without any compensations of True Love. Everybody gather round to draw straws!” (Side note: when have we ever seen Roger desiring to have a relationship with a woman of 50?)

*** Don is driven to near-suicidal (saying goodbye to Peggy, etc.) paralysis, helpless on the ground, by the news that his heavy-smoker ex-wife has terminal cancer, and by her remark that since he hasn’t been around to see his sons in several weeks, that means he’s not going to be raising them. Oh, and also: the niece of the real Don’s wife, a girl he barely knows, left without saying goodbye. That would break anyone!

So of course our Don is sitting on the ground, bereft of the power of movement through the depth of his depression. Because that’s something we’ve seen a lot from Don, over the years: he’s a guy who is prone to sliding to the ground with a complete loss of all functions, all will to live. Happens all the time. Luckily, all it takes to cure him is a long hug with a stranger who says he feels unseen and unloved. Wow!

*** Clearly Weiner had to get Don to a place that has a lot of hippy-types and also a hill. Gotta have the hill. A woman who is unhappy in her personal life would be the ideal person to get Don there. How about a woman who feels guilt because she left her own child? Perfect! So, Weiner creates Diana—a woman tormented by guilt for leaving her daughter (who duly hates and resents her for it).

Apparently there were some sort of production scheduling problems, because we ended up with Stephanie (the niece of the real Don’s wife) shoehorned into the role that was pretty clearly intended for Diana.

Don’s only real connection with Stephanie was that he was fond of the real Don’s wife and had had some brief interactions with the niece over the years, and then offered help to her while she was pregnant in 1969. The father of Stephanie’s baby was in jail, wasn’t he? So the plot element of having The Woman, Deeply Important to Don, agonizing over the child she abandoned…was awkward when foisted onto Stephanie. Don didn’t have any deep emotional involvement with Stephanie.

And the “abandoned her child” storyline didn’t make a lot of sense for Stephanie. She’d been a Berkeley student in 1964 so had to have been at least, what, 24 or so in 1970? She’d had this baby and then for some reason had given it to, who, the parents of the in-jail father? I don’t recall the dialog here. Why did she do that, again? Since the finale takes place in October 1970, the baby couldn’t have been very old when given up. It’s a sad thing when a mother gives up a baby–but it’s not particularly uncommon.

A woman leaving a child who’s old enough to know what’s happening is something much less common. And that’s the situation that the Stephanie character seemed to be talking about in the group sessions. This was pretty clearly originally a Diana plotline.

*** I’m surprised that so many seem to be pleased with the development of Don making very little effort to get to the home of his children after learning that their mother is dying. Nice he could sit up on that hill and find his bliss. He could have hired a car to come get him, but, why bother?

Yes, it’s nice that Sally is a loving sister—but she’s only sixteen. If she’s to be the primary caregiver during her mother’s last months and after her death, then of course she (Sally) won’t be graduating from her prestigious boarding school and is unlikely to be able to attend college. Why is this okay?

Keeping the fate of Bobby and Gene so vague and unsettled seems less like “deliberate ambiguity” and more like “couldn’t be bothered to work it out.”

In sum: I don’t buy the idea that Don cured his own ills by giving that guy a hug. It just doesn’t make any sense. I don’t buy that Peggy and Stan are made for each other, or that Roger would happily be seen with a 50-year-old (even if she is Julia Ormond), or that Pete and Trudy decided, after all this, that they are deeply in love, or that Pete would willingly leave the part of the world in which he gets automatic respect from nearly everyone he meets as a Knickerbocker, or that Joan would plunge into industrial-film production on her own with so little experience in that field. All seem contrived and deeply improbable.

And the Coke ad, postulated as the culmination of seven seasons of storytelling—as the crowning emotional moment, meant to round off and satisfy: how sad, how very sad a miscalculation that was.

I am really enjoying the different interpretations as well.

They’re obviously leaving things open for a “Let’s find out what’s happened to them in the number of years since we saw them last!” made-for-TV movie somewhere down the line.

I think if James Gandolfini hadn’t died, we’d’ve seen one for The Sopranos by now.

Of course Don made the coke ad. Go back and watch the last two scenes again. It’s not just the girl with the pigtails - the whole scene of multicultural, hippie love on a hilltop by the sea, is a recreation of that moment at the retreat where Don got his groove back. Peggy is a talented woman and she’s got great things ahead of her, but she’s never known or wanted that kind of experience.

And it’s not a slap in the face to Coke or McCann - both companies were down with it. Their twitter feeds today have made that clear. Why wouldn’t they be? This morning, everyone is talking about Coke and humming that tune.

The point of the refridgerator speech - we’ve spent all this time listening to Don make speeches when all he wanted was to be told that he was loved. This time, Don listened to someone else make that speech - and responded the way he hoped other people would respond to him. It was a real turning point.

Don didn’t become someone else after that moment. Instead he embraced himself after a lifetime of running: a natural born salesman.

I love Peggy & Stan. She deserves him after a lifetime of tragic dating choices. I love that Joan realized that men were holding her back. I love Trudy getting what she wants and Meredith landing on her feet. I love Roger with a woman who has his number and a son who eats pancakes with him. I love that Burt will always be Burt. I love the Halloween decorations hung on the Dream of the Fisherman’s Wife. I love Sally stepping up and making peace with her family; it’s awful but it’s going to be alright. I love that Pete doesn’t want to be Don anymore. I love the cactus. I love that Harry is off by himself at the elevator when all the important stuff is happening.

I love this show and I love that they gave it a proper ending.

I hate when people claim to have predicted something without having done so publicly.

But when I heard the speculation that Don might in the end find Jesus, my reaction (after recoiling) was that it would be more plausible for him to find one of those eastern religion/spiritual/self-help blends that were all the rage back then.

As for the episode, I’m (right now) feeling a little underwhelmed. It was better than the speculated "“D. B. Cooper” ending would have been.

I liked the exchange between Don and Stephanie when he showed up all ragged on her doorstep:

Don: “Got any whiskey? I’ve been drinking nothing but beer all night”.
Stephanie: “I’ll make coffee”.

(That’s how I remember it - corrections welcome).

All of this. Exactly.

Somewhere today I saw an interview excerpt in which Weiner ruled out any spin-offs or TV-movie updates. When I find it again, I’ll post it.

But, yeah. “Let’s leave the door open” has been responsible for a good number of less-than-artistic choices for finales—Dexter probably being the most infamous recent example.

You can’t blame those involved for wanting to get another paycheck, somewhere down the line; that’s only natural. And fans sometimes care enough about getting More to be willing to ignore the finale teleplay-contortions necessary to keeping all those Future Story doors open.

But, yikes. Some awful writing has resulted from that decision.

He’s a lumberjack and he’s NOT okay.

Another board said that Leonard the weeping manager further spurred Don’s imagination. What’s the one thing in the fridge that never gets passed over? An icy cold Coca-Cola!

:cool:

Another way to read the ending is that the mass marketing of the counterculture in things like Coke ad was going to happen, with or without Don Draper. That even if Don turned his back on the machine, it rolled on without him. And the real people he had worked with were indistinguishable from the archetypes in the ad. Like any good machine, the individual parts are replaceable.

You’re shortchanging Peggy’s character. That’s not “what her wrap-up amounted to.” Why can’t she have her career and be brilliant at McCann AND also be loved by a man who supports her ambition and sees her creative potential? Are these two things mutually exclusive in your mind?

I bet that Roger had made far less plausible requests of his secretaries, and expected them to be carried out. When they were alone a few minutes later, he all but admitted that he had been making up tasks to keep her busy in the hopes that Don would return in time to save her job.

We live in different worlds, then.

Jon Hamm pretty much says that Draper writes the Coke ad:

Edit: Which would also mean that he’s back at McCann and thus near to Betty & the kids.

I read that interview with Jon Hamm and it’s not definitive, of course. Only Matthew Weiner can tell us for sure what he meant by the ending and as far as I know, he hasn’t done so. I think he prefers the ambiguity.

No, but I feel that Hamm has more insight into it than any of us and am willing to accept his opinion as most probable. Even though it goes against my own initial impressions.

There’s something there to support whatever impression but Hamm mentions that he talked with Weiner a lot about the ending and Hamm of course had his own thoughts going into the scenes. If he says that’s his impression, it’s good enough for me.

Must. Resist.

mmm

+1 This. Exactly. It was perfect.

Hey, two questions. Please don’t laugh - I am awful at following along:

  1. In the previous episode, at the beginning, Don was stopped by a cop while driving. The cop was like “You didn’t think we’d ever find you did you?” and Don was like “I’m not who you think I am.” And that was that. Then he took his car to be fixed and had the motel saga. What was all that? Just a dream?

  2. What was with the kids driving in the desert in Utah? He was gonna invest, but maybe not, and they were all buds, and they made him leave yadda yadda Stephanie. What?

I’m not getting all the Richard hate; he & Joan have very different ideas about what they want in life & he’s been pretty honest & upfront with her. He’s been where Joan is and knows full well that her company will take up most of her time & Kevin will take up the rest. If there roles were reversed Joan would’ve ended things too.

They are. They make the perfect old married couple. My WAG Marie will get 1/3 when Roger croaks; Ellery (his grandson) & Kevin each get a 1/3 in trust.

A private duty nurse would interfere in there (failing) attempts to pretend everything is normal.

Agreed, Peggy & Stan are well suited for each-other. I could imagine them being the husband & wife team that forms their own agency.

Not going to happen, but I’d love to see it. Here’s Tom & Lorenzo’s blog post for Person to Person. :smiley: I wonder if Mad Style will address naked hippie guy.