sachertorte:
Could you remind me why?
Here’s the post that put him on my radar:
I want to look up Sach’s history a bit more. The 3rd party play would be a very ballsy gambit, I agree. But what purpose did it serve at the time of claiming? Were they both under that much pressure to break down like that on Day 2? That seems very hasty for something that could massively backfire.
Currently, I’m opposed to wasting a lynch on known or suspected 3rd party. That may change.
First of all, even in a game this size, having Town, Wolves, Mafia, AND a FIVE person 3rd party? That’s almost as large as each scum team. That’s not a 3rd party, that’s a fourth faction! And a 3rd party with (multiple?) power roles that’s completely off the radar in regards to Role PMs?
And why does 3rd party need power roles anyway? If the win condition is just to survive, why the hell would they need to investigate anyone? Lynch them all! Who cares as long as they stick around.
And why would their win condition be to just survive to the end? Why would the mods have so much explanation in the rules about potential exclusive win conditions for 3rd party if there wasn’t one in the game?
No. Nothing about Crys’s claim makes a lick of sense.
But I just don’t know what to do about it.
Since then, he’s been much more…sane…and I feel like Nanook is molehill mountaineering. Especially so since it doesn’t come back to Ender’s nonsense post.
vote Nanook
I’m still sold on Prof P’s apology. Narrowly, since he’s been going back to bad ideas like voting third parities, but I believe it’s bad townie ideas. It seems that Pleonast hadn’t investigated Prof by D3, and I an not convinced he investigated him N3 to draw the vote (again).