I’m suprised we have so many 30s & 31s without ANY 2s. How’s that work?
Thanks for all the responses so far.
I’m going to do one more round of this with better questions. Please feel free to suggest any.
I’m suprised we have so many 30s & 31s without ANY 2s. How’s that work?
Thanks for all the responses so far.
I’m going to do one more round of this with better questions. Please feel free to suggest any.
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
No opinion
Disagree
Disagree
No opinion
Agree
Agree
No opinion
Disagree
Disagree
No opinion
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
No opinion
Disagree
No opinion
Agree
Agree
Agree
No opinion
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
No opinion
Agree
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
No opinion
Agree
By the way, for the second round: ray20 – must our responses be posted publicly? Is that an important part of the study? Will it be possible to have somewhere we can e-mail responses?
For your reading pleasure, Jerry Pournelle, Ph.D. (with degrees in political science and engineering as well as being a best-selling author) provides you with the Pournelle Axes. (The article is excerpted from a Baen-published book and was written by Pournelle)
I agree on only 4.
7,11,26,41
This is pretty fun. I had to stretch myself to give answers to some of these, but a few of these issues are just too complex or not specific enough as stated to reduce to a binaristic resolution, which is an inevitable consequence of polling and comparative studies. Of course I’m sure you recognize all that.
I agree with only 1, 7, 11, 23, 25, 26, 28, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43.
Well, I’ll give it a shot.
Blanks indicate confusion or indecision.
Maybe the problem is the inadequacy of the concept of summing up opinions according to a left/right spectrum. Are you familiar with the idea of using a diamond pattern instead? Also called the Nolan chart?
Fascinating! Thank you, Polycarp!
This is similar to the Nolan chart, but perhaps better. I need to delve into it more.
And before reading this, it never occured to me that some people might want to hang on to the inadequate left/right spectrum out of a desire to render murky their actual position.
I’m trying to get away from all of those we-know-the-predefined-dimensions type models of opinion space, and create something more open ended.
In other words I’m not making a map of what political space SHOULD be according to some meaningful classification scheme, but what it is (here anyway), even if that puts socialists in the center next to fascists and anarchists.
One thing that’s really interesting so far is the structural importance of religion, universalism (#34 & maybe 20) and libertarianism as bridges between the left and right.
So far (and this interpretation reveals my bias), the right seems divided into sortof the rhetorical whatever-sounds-the-meanest right (the anti-emotional right? questions 1+15+18+27) and sincere free market / religious conservatism (these two are surprisingly close, which reminds me of Tom Frank’s hilarious little essay “The God that Sucked.” http://www.thebaffler.com/gts.html)
My turn.
All other questions lacked enough data to express an opinion on.