Most men in America are circumcised at an early age. Most men in Europe aren’t. I personally think the foreskin has an important task of protecting the sensitive glans from abrasion and dryness.
I’m uncircumcised. My penis has a narrow transverse strip at the back ridge of the glans that seems to be the source of my sexual pleasure. Other parts of the head and the shaft (especially the latter) are pretty numb in comparison: this is the sweet spot. That ridge is the only part of my penis that is almost always “sheathed”, sans full-on erection. Had I been circumcised, that sensitive part of my anatomy would’ve become as desensitized and dry as the rest of my glans (it even has a different, more vibrant purple hue to it). I’m not sure I would be able to orgasm without it (I have done experiments on this).
Obviously, the hundreds of millions of cut men around the world do orgasm all the time. I’m just wondering if they have a different “way” of achieving it, having a weathered knob to work with. So, circumees: what is the most sensitive part of your penises? What needs to rub against something for you to get off? I’m not looking for a debate on circumcision but for personal penile anecdotes. I’ve wondered about this from an early age.
My penis is plenty sensitive. I give women the best minute and a half of their lives. My knob isn’t weathered, covered in cuts and callouses or whatever you seem to think. It’s not exactly exposed to the elements. The head is the most sensitive part, of course. Funnily enough, given that I’m not a fountain of virility when it comes to lasting a while in the sack, I’ve never come from oral before, despite regular attempts. I’m not sure if my insensitivity when it comes to oral is because of my cut cock or because of my constant masturbation. YMMV.
Provided you don’t have friction to the point it turns into leather, can it really make that big a difference? Your fingertips get plenty of friction yet remain sensitive.
The reality is circumcision, male or female, is mutilation.
All mutilation, and that includes piercings, tattoos, and so on, of children is wrong. At the very least they should be old enough to understand what they’re doing, say around the age of consent.
Anyone doing this shit to babies is a sick fuck. SICK FUCK.
I will state here that the edge of my foreskin is pretty sensitive, so would rather have it than not, although I guess I wouldn’t miss it if it was gone (ie, if I had never had it in the first place since it was chopped off at birth).
In my experience, it provides protection and lubrication and I quite like the matt finish over the gloss finish.
Edit: on the temperature thing, it was my understanding that the very tip of the penis is unable to sense temperature at all, although the rest of it can.
The reality is that your entire post has little to do with the questions the OP asked. Or were you trying to de-rail the thread into a debate about the ethics of circumcision and have it closed or moved?
Anyway, the OP, my experiences sound like campp’s. Works just fine. Is not withered and dead. Still very vibrant and colorful, and very much prone to be pleasured. I can’t imagine having more sensitivity – I’d damn near pass out everytime I touched it.
Well, sucks to be you, because you pro-mutilation brigade will never have it as good as me.
However, male circumcision is not as evil as female circumcision. Ever seen what they do with that? Some people think it should be called female genital mutilation, and I probably agree with them. That’s self-evidently sick shit, even far more worse!
But even ear piercings are nasty frankly. Anyone arguing for any of this is a nutbar.
This is an important issue for me. It should be important for anyone thinking about these things rationally, but so few do in America (over here, everyone agrees with me :)).
Heck, check my very first post here. It’s about circumcision. It’s why I signed up as an Angry person.
Threads about circumcision I will appear in. I’ve no interest in “baiting” people but I sure as hell will stick up for the rights of millions of mutilated babies. And I won’t apologise for that.
In my case i find that the head has a sort of odd sensitivity. I feel a tickly sort of sensation and pain, but not really pleasure. That comes from the area directly behind it and the shaft.
[Moderator Note]No, you will not hijack this thread. Unless the topic of a thread is whether or not circumcision should be done to babies, you are not to bring up your off-topic pet issue just because you spot the word “circumcision” somewhere in the thread. It may be an important issue to you, but it isn’t the topic of this particular thread.[/Moderator Note]
