How bizarre that a cartoonist would not “get” that the cartoon was not meant to deceive the reader into thinking it was a genuine example of the strip, but was satire.
Or is it not as obvious as seemed to me? Did anybody read the ‘Daily Show’ book and think that was a genuine Mallard Fillmore cartoon and not a satire? How about the Doonesbury cartoon before it, was that not obvious satire?
Yes. It’s an obvious parody. Extremely obvious. On the third consecutive page of political cartoon parodies. Right under an equally vicious Doonesbury parody, so he can’t even claim partisan bias on that page. The only possible confusion I can see is that someone might think that Tinsley was pking fun of himself as a joke. Whatever. At least he could say he didn’t make it, unlike his fellow “victims” Nast and Schultz.
Well, Mallard Fillmore has always been a joke-free zone. Rush Limbaugh (who can be very funny and scathing) is much better, but Tinsley is merely content to just keep repeating “Liberals are stupid.”
What’s even more clueless is that Tinsley is saying exactly the same thing the Bill O’Reilly said about Al Franken’s book, and it comes off as though he’s satirizing O’Reilly’s complaints.
The Las Vegas Review-Journal prints Tinsley’s strip daily, and they usually try and make sure it’s juxtaposed with Doonesbury, thereby offering a “right” slant to counter Trudeau’s “left” slant.
Tinsley is never funny; it’s the comics page equivalent of having Rush Limbaugh scream one of his trademark catchphrases at the public over and over and over and over…
Hence the last panel: “Oops! I forgot to make a joke!”
Why on Earth did he (meaning the Mallard Filmore cartoonist) wait until now to do this? America: the Book has been out since September 2004; where has he been? Where have those emailing fans of his been, too?
[sub]Not even commenting on the idiocy of the guy’s complaints. :rolleyes: [/sub]
I’ve never seen the “America” book, so I had no idea what Tinsley was complaining about.
As it is, it sounds like Tinsley was griping about nothing, and is merely making himself look silly in the process. Kind of like the people complaining that the Jon Stewart caricature is anti-semitic.
Look, Bruce Tinsley is almost never funny, but he’s a superb caricaturist (something no one could ever say about Garry Trudeau). For that very reason, I’ve often wished he could hook up with someone who could write him some funny material.
So, if it upsets you that the pictures of Jon Stewart showed him as an ugly dweeb with a hook nose, guess what? It’s because Jon Stewart IS an ugly dweeb with a hook nose!
Oh, Stewart can’t let this one pass. I’m surprised the ADL hasn’t screamed bloody murder over such a blatant physical stereotype of… uh… “New York Liberals”.
PS- THIS JUST IN: Historians have revealed that the foreward by Thomas Jefferson in America the Book is a forgery! As evidence they point to the fact that Thomas Jefferson in fact died more than a century and a half before Halle Berry’s first movie, and yet he mentions her!