Last week, a hiker reported he had been jumped by a big cat near Palo Alto. He said it had knocked him off the trail and then run off. He was shaken up, but otherwise unhurt. The authorities went into full damage control mode, calling in a tracker and his dogs to hunt the beast down. They were unable to find any sign of a mountain lion.
Today, there was a little twist to the story:
In all my years of hiking, I’ve never encounted a stealth attack dog. :rolleyes:
The first time I tried to go hiking at Whitling Ranch, it was closed because of mountain lion sightings. That was a couple of weeks before the attack on the cyclists. Nowadays, almost every trailhead in California has a big sign warning people that they’re entering mountain lion habitat.
My theory about the Palo Alto “victim” – he slipped off the trail, got dinged up, embellished the story to a friend, reported it to back his story up, and got in a fib.
On a more serious note, I wish they did charge him with something. If they found a mountain lion, they were gonna kill it, right? That would have been terrible for them to kill a cougar for his lie.
It’s an injustice, I tell you! Wild animals are always getting falsely blamed for stuff like this because people know they can get away with it. Just look at all the blame put on my wild coyote brethren for missing pets and livestock. It’s never a coyote … it’s uh … that Chupacabra thing, yeah, that’s the ticket. Chupacabra. nods
There ARE lions roaming the eastern slopes of the Santa Cruz Mountains–that’s for sure. There are probably 4 or 5 wandering around between Pacifica and Ben Lomond.
BUT…they couldn’t find any sign; on his clothes or on the trail, just a day or two after the “attack”. That sounded fishy to me.
Who knows, there could be an incident next week. It is their habitat, after all. Too bad we like to build houses on the edge and walk around in the forests, I guess.