I don’t know much about ‘advanced’ baseball metrics, but isn’t that going to be a big part of the explanation? Not counting errors is going to help his WAR a hell of a lot (I don’t know the equation but it seems to follow).
And “Obligatory ‘stats only tell so much’ statement.”
It’s not just a matter of his statistical contribution, but the perception on the team. Plenty of players have been felt to be assets when their strict on-field worth was only ordinary–it can work the other way too.
As for the Hall of Fame, I say again: no player prominently linked to steroids is going in. It only takes 25%+1 of HoF voters to consistently decline to support a player’s candidacy to keep him out. Early returns suggest there is far, far more than that.
That’s a fair point, and I’m not going to say he was a great guy - just that when he “quit” to force his way out of Boston he was still hitting the ball.
For now, I think that’s true. And I’d like it. But I don’t think it can last. I mean, they can delay inducted Bonds and Clemens and not vote them in with the near-unanimous totals that we once expected - I said at least once that Clemens was going to break Seaver’s record for highest voting percentage - but do you think they’ll really keep them out until they fall off the ballot? I’m not sure I can imagine it. For me the second-best scenario would have Bonds and Clemens missing their own inductions because they’re in prison, which is even more impossible.