What if you don’t care about stuffing him into his clothes? Seriously, if I was with some naked dead guy, I’d just want as many miles between me and him as possible, forget about his dignity, man.
I agree with that. What I disagree with is saying “I’ll tell you all I know, but I need immunity first.”
That’s just sad. Used to be a guy could depend on the chick he was banging to at least try to cover up the fact that he was banging someone he wasn’t married to. I blame the lack of parental involvement.
Ladies and gentlemen, if the married person you are committing adultery with expires during the act, first thing, brava!, or bravo!, as appropriate. In the future try to use your power only for good.
Second, please do whatever you can to help the deceased maintain plausible deniability. You know you’re not going to fool everybody, you may not fool anybody, but by creating the sense of verisimilitude you allow others to pretend it was a natural event while the deceased was balancing his or her checkbook.
The widow will appreciate it, and if the decedent were polled he or she would second the motion.
Well yeah, Mary, Kate, and Ashley.
Ellery Queen used this twist in one of his mysteries. I can’t name it because that’s obviously giving the whole plot away.
Of course, that was a book. And it’s a half century old. So I guarantee nobody in Hollywood has ever heard of it.
It could be as bad as her giving him the Oxycontin or as little as she knew he was taking illegal prescription drugs, or in between with her getting high with him.
In any of these circumstances, I can see her wanting immunity.
I thought for sure your second link was going to be this.
Ehhhh, I’m not sure. Even if she knew he was doing drugs, it wouldn’t make her guilty. The fact that she wants a blanket immunity before saying anything is a bad sign. Even if she is guilty, she’d be better off not saying anything at all and waiting for a court order, if any such things happened.