Mass murder on the high seas (Venezuelan "drug boat")

It sends a bad message about our military, like maybe they’re too scared to stop suspicious vessels.

That people who had a legit reason to be on the water were rightly afraid for their lives was made light of.

Everyone from Kegbreath on down obeyed an illegal order and should be held accountable.

Pete’s working on it…

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is clearing the ranks of the military’s lawyers to “get them out of the way” of possibly illegal moves, according to current and former defense officials.

https://www.rawstory.com/pete-hegseth-2674186502/

Apparently, there were two survivors of the last boat hit and, inexplicably, they were rescued by the Navy. On another occasion a craft with survivors was hit again. These two survivors are now in custody but any evidence of wrongdoing is at the bottom of the Caribbean.

Not inexplicable that they were rescued by the Navy. My understanding of the Law of the Sea is that every vessel is required to rescue anyone. I think even during an actual war (such as World War II), even enemy ships would rescue sailors from sunken vessels.

Unfortunately not every time. Look up the USS Wahoo. And before anyone says “subs can’t carry prisoners”, that doesn’t mean you’re obligated to machine gun them in the water.

Did I even say “every time”?

After blowing all those boats out of the water, and all the death, suddenly the Laws of the Sea kick in.

I guess maybe if you’re still on the boat you’re fair game, so best bet is immediately jump in the water for rescue.

I’m just gonna say that once you don’t hold anyone accountable for extra-judicial killings of people in an ill-defined and questionable legal “war on terror”, this is the next obvious step.

The legal bullshit of a “Unitary Executive” of the Bush administration is now empowering a senile, hate-filled megalomaniac to kill whomever he sees fit, whether it is drug dealers, immigrants, or US citizens. Congrats once again to Republican lawyers and their supporters. One more rip in the Constitution.

When even Rand Paul is offering lukewarm criticism of your suspicious boat strikes, that….really means something?

Sen. Graham: Why Mr. Paul, are you in need of mah faintin’ couch?
Sen. Collins: I’m concerned! Are you concerned? This is very concerning!
Sen. McConnell: The fainting couch is in use.

One thing to note: The fact that these war criminals would rather send these “massively dangerous nacro-terrorists” that survive back to countries rather than keeping them in custody and trying them for the multitude of crimes they’re committing screams volumes about the war criminal’s desire to avoid any oversight whatsoever and the speciousness of their claims.

How many people does he have to murder before someone tries to exact a little revenge? Of course, that would be another pretense for retaliation. Which is just what he wants.

But, as you say, any revenge tactic would be construed as an act of war by DJT, and then all hell would break lose.

Although, I’m not sure what revenge could be exacted…what is Columbia going to do, shoot down a USAF fighter jet? Good luck trying to accomplish that.

It would be insane but not impossible, obviously shooting down a fighter is out of the question but using drones to attack U.S. Navy ships among other things would not be out of the range of possibilities.
Then again it would be utterly insane to give Trump and his lackeys exactly what they want, Colombia’s leaders not being batshit bonkers they will refrain from “kinetic” responses and try to win (or at least survive) the political conflict instead of the unwinnable military one.

An act of terrorism in the US equal to the terrorism launched by trump.

That would be even easier and even more stupid/insane.

At first I read that as “fartin’ couch”.

Either way, it would probably smell pretty bad.

It’s also a pretty common response to attacks by an enemy too powerful to fight conventionally. And not just by governments. People are certainly not going to just sit there and take it indefinitely. If America intends to attack people at random, it can expect pushback.

Common in the Middle East may be, the U.S. has been meddling in South American politics, inciting coups, stealing Panama from Colombia, supporting genocidal governments, etc. for a long time now and there has never been any South American terrorist attack in U.S. soil. (No, Puerto Rico is in North America)

The president of Colombia is a level-headed person and would not countenance that sort of stupidity.