Just wondering, has anyone been successful at building the numberline by using only math functions and the number 4? Let’s say, from 1-30. The simplest example: 4+4-4+4 = 0, for starters.
Are some numbers simply NOT possible to “create” in this fashion? (Yes, you can use factorials, exponents, etc…
It’s been awhile since I’ve thought about this. IIRC, I think 17 or maybe 23, as WAGs, might be such numbers. Hmm…what about the number “7”? That might be a tricky one, too.
Just wondering if other SDopers have played this game and what their findings are… - Jinx
There are two functions by which many of the familiar functions can be constructed. They are Z(x) defined by Z(x) = 0, and N(x), given by N(x) = x + 1. Given these two functions, it’s quite easy to map 4 onto any natural number.
To wit: 0 is Z(4), 1 is N(Z(4)), 2 is N(N(Z(4))), and so forth.
Every other time I’ve seen this problem, the allowable operations were all things that a middle schooler could reasonably be expected to know, and nothing that involved writing other numbers or letters (i.e., just notation using non-alphanumeric symbols).
Using this guideline, I’ve seen lists going all the way up to 112. I haven’t seen one for 113.