McClellan press briefing 9/6/05. Maybe the press has found their balls?

Oh, but what a delicious little gangbang that was. The Bush Adminstration spin machine was in full effect, but as far as I’m aware, this was the first time reporters were actually calling it out with such force. The cowardly lapdogs seem to be getting it, finally.

Are we getting our press back? Is the “party of responsibility” finally going to take any? Will talking points finally be called out and nailed to the wall every time they’re used? Are we on the way to a fact-based community?

I can only hope.

Oh, but that does my heart good.

This reporter, he didn’t have an untimely accident, did he?

That was beautiful. Now, stay tuned for the “War on Journalism”.

Read further on. It gets better…

Heh.

I think it’s come close before. (Salon, click-through or subscription needed)

I’m cautiously optimistic, in that light.

I feel a little sorry for McClellan, in the same way I felt sorry for the Iraqi information minister. They’re both being hammered and both have nothing to fall back on but the same recycled talking points.

Fuck, I want to buy the guy who kept telling McClellan to stop with the talking points a big brewsi. Anyone know who he is?

Please, oh PLEASE, tell me: Which journalist was it?

Holy crap! Nevermind that it’s a “talking point.” It sounded an awful lot like he’s saying that they’re not worrying to much about responding to a catastrophic terrorist attack, since they’ve got this swell “prevention” plan they’re working on – one that anyone with a lick of sense can see is practically purpose-built to foster more terrorist attacks against the United States. :smack:

Sleep tight, neighbours. :frowning:

That’s for sure. They’re spreading something, but it’s not democracy.

This type of ambush vaguely reminds me of some patient verbally getting into an argument with the receptionist at a doctor’s office over the doctor running late with his appointments. Yeah, you might feel good unleashing some fury on some poor helpless go-between, but it ain’t correcting any problems about a doctor keeping his schedule.

I just hope this patient has enough bile worked up for his internist, x-ray tech, pharmacist, and surgeon…since the doctor may be waiting for their input as well.

Eh, screw it. Line 'em all up and bitchslap them all…receptionist included if it makes you feel better.

Let’s not get too happy about this. The journalists and news outlets have always been whores to public opinion and this case is no different. People are angry about the response to Katrina so now you have every “journalist” rushing to be the first to claim their shiny crediblity and edginess merit badge to put on their khaki cargo vest.

“Look at me. I’m hard nosed and edgy!!!”

The standard for journalistic cajones was set when Murrow went after McCarthy. This ain’t even close.

Even if the harder questions are being asked purely out of a desire on the reporter’s part to appear edgy and to validate his or her “street cred,” it’s a DAMN sight better than the softball questions they HAVE been asking to insure their continued access to the White House.

I’m quite impressed that the reporters are finally asking the harder questions. I just hope this continues.

Although this isn’t the White House Press, I thought this was an interesting interview. This is the transcript from “Meet The Press” on Sunday. It’s Tim Russert and Michael Chertoff, Russert’s questions are italicized by me, bolding is also mine.

Ambush? It was a press conference, not a Michael Moore “grab 'em on the street” Q&A (or Q&ignore, as is generally warranted)!

I agree – bitchslap 'em all. From the top on down…

I don’t think so. If they keep asking tough questions about the accountability of this thing after the public has lost interest, then I’ll acknowledge them as having done their jobs. I’d bet money that in under a month we’ll be back to looking for the missing white women. This will only last for as long as the majority remains angry. 5…4…3…

And yet the Katrina story will remain newsoerthy for months to come – oh, not in the headline-grabbing sense, but the recovery efforts will go on and on. States that took in evacuees will have to grapple with what to do with them.

I believe his name was Q.

I think his name was Q, too.

Scott McClellan is hardly the receptionist at a doctor’s office. He’s the primary spokesman and press liaison for the Bush Administration. As such, you’d expect he would be prepared to discuss the administration’s actions and plans with some authority. “Helpless go-between?” Try “voice of the White House”. If he appears helpless, it’s because the administration is hapless.