McCoy offers the defendant a gift: six years

I’m certain some do - I’ve even encountered it in the workplace. On the other hand, did you ever consider that not every convicted felon lies and not every employer refuses to hire any and all former offenders?

If we’re still talking about the Law and Order universe, not many. McCoy seldom gets the accused to confess on the stand; when he has in-court “I did it!” moments, they typically come from someone else, and presumably the defense lawyer is sitting quietly as McCoy creates an automatic acquittal for his client.

In real life, an appeal for inadequate representation is governed by the standards of Strickland v. Washington – the petitioner must show both that his attorney’s conduct fell below a definite, measurable objective standard, AND that he suffered specific prejudice as a result. That’s a huge bar.

For example, let’s imagine a murder trial in which the defense lawyer falls asleep during the trial. On appeal, the defendant must prove not only the sleeping, which clearly falls below an objective standard of professional conduct, but also must point to some specific harm that his case received as a result. He can’t simply say that awake, the guy would have been a better lawyer; he must point to some objection that went unmade because the lawyer was asleep, or some key procedural motion that was defaulted because of the lawyer’s sleep.

It’s a very difficult standard to meet.

Wlel, I can tell you that when the question is worded in the “have you ever been arrested” fashion , I always lie and I have never been caught, even when fingerprints have been taken and a state license has been involved.

Further, the Court implies that the prejudice must be so grave that it would have changed the outcome of the trial.

Actually, they don’t really say that. They state that a judge is NOT the jury and that they will not determine the guilt or innocence of a person.

But then they go into a multi-prong, multi-factor test that after taking 3 Advil boils down to “would the jury have still convicted had the lawyer done XXX” and, in fact, making themselves jurors. :slight_smile: