Me and my big mouth, OR

I talked to my apartment manager last week. “I’m planning to buy in the next year, and I really don’t want to sign a 12 month lease. Do I have any options vetween sign or leave”.

She said yes, I actualy had two other options. Deal #1: I could rent month-to-month, pay $25/month over the lease amount, and leave with 30 days notice. Deal #2: They add a cancellation clause to my lease. I pay the normal lease amount, but I can give 60 days notice and pay a $500 fee to buy my way out of any further obligation.

Stupid me. Instead of signing up for Good Deal #1 on the spot, I asked her to explain Bad Deal #2. I thought I was missing something. “Why would anyone sign up for Deal #2”, I asked, “when even if they never do move, under deal #1 they’re only paying an extra $300 total for the right to leave on short notice?. How does deal #2 ever work out better?”

She said, “That’s a very good question, Boyo Jim. I can’t think of any. I’m going to have to call the home office to have them clarify this”.

The next day she left a message to stop by the complex office, as the home office had explained things to her. The explanation - yes, it does appear that deal #1 is too good a deal compared to deal #2. Solution, we will double the monthly surcharge for the month to month option to $50. Now, if I never do move, deal #1 will cost me $100 more than deal #2.

They seem happy. They have now established a real “choice” for their customers. Future tennants will perceive that they might save a couple hundred bucks or so by picking the right option. Only I (and my resident manager, and of course the bloodsucking dragoons back at the home office) understand that they’ve simply chosen to fuck us all out of a few more bucks. And I caused it. And I’m the first of an unknown number of tennants who’ll pay more for this option than they might otherwise have. This is a 200 unit complex, and who knows how many more belong to the “home office”.

Shit.

:: sigh ::

Open mouth

Insert foot

Chew vigorously

:: sigh ::

Look on the bright side: You now have added incentive to buy. Quickly. Before anyone finds out who got the policy changed. :wink:

Heh, sorry about that. I opened this thread because I thought (from the little pop-up blurb) that it might relate to my situation. I have been renting my apartment month-to-month for sixteen years. When I first moved in, the landlord had just died, and his heirs were trying to decide what to do with the place. So they rented to me on a month-to-month, not knowing if they would be around for a full year. Eventually they sold the building, and the new landlady let me stay on month-to-month. Then she died (I know, the building seems cursed, but it only seems to affect owners, not tenants), and the building was sold by the heirs to the current landlord, who seems particularly clueless. I still pay month-to-month rent (no surcharge, as far as I know – I’m not sure what the deal is with other tenants). Of course, when this guy dies I could be kicked out, but as your story demonstrates, why rock the boat?