MENSA is just one letter away from menso (ask your hispanic friend)
what is MENSA’s purpose, do they raise money through fund drives to cure cancer, do they promote tourisim or goodwill, what do they do???
mensa vs. menudo fan club: menudo fan club is not exclsionary, any one can join, not that i would know… i swear, it wasn’t me it was my brother… “vamos a la playa”
I am not a member, but I can understand the urge that prompts some people to join. I enjoy discusisons about mathematics, philosophy, art, programming, history, comic books, combat, sports, poetry, variations in unix implementaions, movies, animals, religion, kinesthetics, etc. There have been times in my life when it was not easy find a knowledgable partner for some of those conversations. I never tried mensa, but if some folks find it a good place to meet interesting people with diverse interests then I say good for them.
Anyways, I think Morgan has the most comprehensible, not frothing at the mouth, relatively coherent summary of MENSA.
The original root of my MENSA hatred is from high school. One of the more academic kids in my class became a MENSA-ite. He would attempt to defend a position, even if he knew it was wrong, simply so he could garner attention, posture in front of the class, and demonstrate a superiority. Needless to say the kid was an ass. He would take a stance (say being Pro-Mcnamara’s Vietnam Conflict policy) and defend it vigorously (something that I admire), BUT there would never be any concessions. He would state that the US was correct in its actions in ‘Nam and martial all the relevant facts. When anyone would question him, he would disregard their facts, act for a perfect source (difficult to do in class with no internet in front of ya’) and claim that it was all untrue. There was no gray area for him. It was all black and white.
Now, obviously all the MENSA-ites aren’t like him. But I think it demonstrates a pertinent point about things like MENSA. There is no soul in it. The test itself is vapid. As Morgan said, its most puzzles. Anagrams and trick questions, and number series, etc. The test is like some horrid version of of the SAT for grownups.
(note: This is the same kid whose parents, grandparents on both sides, sister, and brother all went to Harvard).
I think that MOST Ms are not like the guy you’re talking about. For crying out loud, he was a teenage boy! And as for soul…in Mensa, as with many other things, you get out what you put in.
It’s just a social club with a rather quirky way of choosing who it lets in. I liked it because when I went to a meeting, I was fairly sure that I’d be able to find someone interesting to talk to.
A teenager he most certainly was not!!! Whenever he walked the halls there was a fould stench of brimstone. He was the devil incarnate. Old Scratch, Beelzebub, Lucifer…Man what an awful human being.
Anyways, you are right. Most of them/you aren’t like that (at least to such an extreme degree…
What am I saying!!! Burn in hell MENSA scum. Come on everybody! Who is with me? <<Insert sounds of crickets chirping and pins dropping) Ahhhh fuggedaboutit…
Ex-Mensan here… belonged once for approximately a year in 1994. Didn’t really get much out of it, save for getting laid once by a fellow Mensan. Of course, there wasn’t much happening in DC as far as Mensa activities - most of it was out in the 'burbs beyond the reach of the Metro and I didn’t have a car. Maybe I’d get more out of it now, but then again I have the SDMB and Pyroto online, and the family and my political group (and some upcoming translation classes) in real life. Which I get a lot out of as it is.
On the other hand, I remember reading a testimonial from one high school kid who joined Mensa and said it was like a breath of fresh air - meeting people he could relate to much more easily, and using that to learn how he could turn his keen intellect into something that didn’t alienate the other students at his school. I could have used that.
Having said that, I will definitely defend Mensa’s right to exist and to admit whoever it wants to based on whatever criteria it chooses to establish. Any organization is going to have its share of obnoxious prigs and I certainly didn’t see that the locals here in DC had a disproportionate number.
A lot of clubs are exclusive. A lot more aren’t. It depends on what the point of the organization is and how its members perceive themselves and the organization.
Every M you met was a jerk, therefore all M’s are jerks. Don’t generalize or anything. I’m currently a lapsed member. And primarily because when I moved to the area, one of the first mailings I received announced the renaming of the local newsletter to The Brainiac. My first thought was I’d rather not associate with that kind of pretentious boor. And just never bothered renewing. The local I was a member of in Boulder, Co, had some of the nicest people I’d ever met. They were just people. We played games, had dinners, went bowling. And they didn’t care in the least what your IQ was. Or even if you were a member. It was fun. Pure and simple. I’m eligible obviously. But so what. I’m just a guy. I’ve crawled through the mud with a rifle, washed dishes, towed car, flipped burgers, installed mainframe OS’s. And I usually do well on tests. Perhaps I’m doing the M local here in Omaha a diservice by not walking into a meeting and asking “who the fuck came up with that newsletter name?”. Like is always said. You get out of it, what you put into it. Perhaps these people need a little bit of earthy advice.
Actually I don’t think I said I was smart. Just that I’m eligible for Mensa membership. To me it just means I do well on tests. My point, if I had one, is that just because the entry requirements are scoring in the top 2% of a standardized test, it doesn’t mean that Mensa is a collection of elitists. It’s just a criteria. There are many organizations I can’t join because I don’t meet their admission requirements. Should I cry elitism?? M’s are just people with a common link. And as for the argument that if we’re so smart why aren’t we rich, I think Scott Adams said it best. “It doesn’t really have any practical application” Hard work will get you much further.
I think this argument about “elitism” hasn’t been fleshed out. A white Jew can’t apply for a scholarship aimed at African Americans. Does this mean the scholarship program is elitist? Maybe and maybe not.
I think the word elitist is being thrown around because the criteria used for MENSA membership are questions on a standardized exam. Answering these questions correctly grants one membership in an organization that supposedly is the creme de la creme of intellectualism. Yet the questions are rather silly. Pattern identification involving number sequences and such. Truthfully, most of the questions are trick questions. So… the group that defines itself as being the creme de la creme of intellectualism is using trick questions and puzzles that could conceivably be found in the NY Times Sunday edition??? Does this strike anyone as bizarre that such a limited set of criteria are used to determine intellectual capacity???
I think some of the social benfits mentioned by Spiritus Mundi and others are understandable.
(wait for it…)
BUT, I think that’s a dangerous line to toe if one is going to assert that MENSA is not exclusive. “I can’t find anyone with whom to talk about UNIX, thus I join MENSA.” certainly will be interpreted by some as being a polite way of saying “99% of the people around me are borderline retarded. I need someone of my own intellect.”
Now I don’t think that’s what madame moderator Lynn or Icefalcon were really saying, but I suspect that it might be true for a lot of MENSA members.
Note: I have interacted with more than just one MENSA member. This entire diatribe isn’t based on one isolated experience…
Grendel, I certainly won’t try to argue that Mensa is not exclusive. It obviously is. There is another group that takes the top 1%. That excludes me. But I really don’t care. If a group has criteria that must be met for membership, then it’s exclusive. Before I was an NCO, I couldn’t go to the NCO club.
Elitist? That’s more difficult to define. To me that’s an attitude. Have I seen that in Mensa? Yep. Do I think it’s prevalent. No. But my experience is not wide spread. I’ve read various articles in newsletters and magazines (Mensan) that indicates to me that most Mensans just like to have fun. But there are snobs. There are snobs everywhere. But I figure if somebody thinks he’s better than me, because he has a higher IQ, fuck 'em.
I think my entire point is to not judge an organization by a few asshole members. And the more I think about it, I might just re-join, walk into the local meeting dressed like a slob (as I usually am), and shout “WASSUP? Where’s the keg?”.
And this doesn’t even touch the discussion about what is IQ, and does it really mean anything?
Joined Mensa as a youth, met some helpful compassionate mentors, bless thier hearts, they did me a world of good, if nothing else exposing me to the pleasure of being with people smarter than me. Checked in five years later, and once again at ten and, eh, no biggy. One thing I did learn: if you’re in Mensa and havent told anybody, dont! It pisses people off, and I mean universally. Non-members, check it out, experiment. Let it slip in a bar conversation with a stranger, for example, that you are in Mensa. Bet you drachma to dipthongs you get an immediate hostile response. Odd, isnt it? Brag you can bench-press 300lbs, cool, you’re a sex machine, they ask for detail, brag that you got a high IQ and they istantly hate your guts.
Mostly: intelligence isn’t a virtue, it is merely a characteristic. Compassion, patience,…those are virtues.
FreakFreely, I couldn’t agree more. Your first statement is supported by Grendel’s opening remarks. That’s one thing that I learned early. Sort of a “don’t ask, don’t tell” philosphy. For that matter, you get less of a reaction if you say you’re gay. And besides, if you brag about your IQ, you’re sure to follow it immediately by doing something stupid.
Something just occured to me. And after almost 49 years, it’s somewhat of a shock. Perhaps I became an underachiever simply to avoid being set apart. Society seems to hate those who appear to be smarter. Beaten as a child, harrased as a teen, ostracized as an adult. A bumper sticker seems to be making the rounds that supports this concept. “My kid beat up your honor roll student” I absolutely detest this.
Grendel, perhaps this explains why people join Mensa. You know that you’re among people that won’t look down upon you simply because you do well on tests. That everyone around you has been through the same thing. That when someone calls you a nerd, a freak, or a geek, it’s said with a smile. You hate Mensa because they won’t let you join? Your answer is violence? Perhaps you didn’t catch FreakFreely’s comment on compassion.
If they didn’t care in the least what your IQ was, then why have a test? I’m sure they were very nice to those people that weren’t members, but I wouldn’t be suprised if the non-members felt like they were being looked down on.
and
What about the poor spuds like me who like to talk about these things too but can’t pass the test?
The main difference between MENSA and the Menudo fan club is the fan club is open to everybody who has an interest. MENSA is not, and the criteria to get in is a test that is used to tell how “smart” someone is. Now, MENSANS may not feel the test is a big deal and they’re really nice people who just want to have a good time, but that is because they passed it. To the rest of us you are saying “you’re not good enough to join”.
Fine, you have a right to exist, but we have a right to get a little steamed about your selection criteria.
Yes, we should love the MENSANS for telling us we’re too stupid to talk to them. Perhaps you should read FreakFreely’s comment again too.
You’ve answered your question above. It’s cool that they can bench 300 because it is something you could do if you worked really hard. So you admire the guy’s determination. When they’re bragging about a characteristic that you don’t have you’ll get pissed because there’s nothing you can do to match it. Think about someone bragging they’re better looking than you and how you’d react.
/me checks around to make sure we are in the BBQ pit.
You are all idiots.
I can just hear you whining. “Nobody likes me when I brag about my IQ.” You really aren’t the sharpest knives in the drawer, are you?
News flash: Nobody likes a braggart.
What is really odd is that someone can make a stupid claim like this and nobody points out the obvious flaw.
Yes, I’ve met people who say stupid things like “Me bench 300 lbs” or “I’ve been with a dozen different women in as many weeks.” These people are socially inept. Bragging is always inappropriate. If someone asks you how much you can bench, or what you got on your SATs, then, if you really want to, go ahead and answer the question. Otherwise, keep your mouth closed.
Once again, proof that being able to solve certain types of puzzles has nothing to do with intelligence.
You really aren’t the sharpest knives in the drawer, are you? **
This unworthy one humbly beseeches the luminescent Himself. Permit me to bask in the Wisdom. Consider the following:
Well, then, what attribute does puzzle-solving ability relate to? Manual dexterity? Binocular vision?
While it is very likely a mistake to define intelligence as problem-solving, to flatly state that it has nothing to do with it is bong-water dumb. Dumb as a barrel of hair, dumb as a box of rocks. Certainly we cannot actually define intelligence, as such, but we’re reasonably sure it has something to do it being able to figure out stuff. Not much debate on that one. Pretty much a concensus.