I just saw something on The Food Network about the Mentos + Diet Coke fountain. As we all know, the reaction is because Mentos have a lot of pits to provide nucleation sites and aspartame reduces the surface tension allowing small bubbles to form large bubbles.
So suppose you use a non-diet soda (or just carbonated water) and a non-food structure that has a lot of very small pits in it, and add something to the liquid to weaken surface tension. A bit of soap?
Stucky, you are new here so I am making this advisory rather than an Official Warning. Insulting comments like this are not permitted in General Questions, nor in any other forum besides the Pit.
I would also note that your first comment was unnecessary and pointless.
I see you have made more than 60 posts in only three days. I strongly suggest, before doing much more posting, that you read all the FAQs and forum rules on this site, and also try to get more of a feel for what is accepted here.
O/T: What’s with the Canadian flag in the background of the office shot? Mythbusters is filmed in San Francisco, and all the team members are American.
This is a link to an article in the American Journal of Physics that describes a study comparing various sodas and candies. Unfortunately, I don’t subscribe to the journal so all I can see is the abstract. There is a bit more about this subject in the Wikipedia article. Edited to add that this is something that’s well-suited to home experimentation, although you might want to wait until it’s warm enough to do this outside.
It’s probably a momento from the “Giant Slingshot” episode, where they were purportedly using a slingshot to get across the Canadian border. I seem to recall Kari waving it around during that episode.
That was used for the illegal immigrant slingshot myth, where Canadians were using a giant slingshot made of bungee cords to fling themselves over the border.
Hmmm, the Mythbusters didn’t do comparisons of diet to regular soda. I grant you the lower surface tension in diet soda will cause slightly bigger fountains (ref), but as you can <sarcasm>clearly</sarcasm> see in this grainy, totally unscientific video, the reaction is fairly comparable. I know the two guys who did the famous fountain with hundreds of bottles said they used diet to make cleanup easier.
Anyone out there a subscriber to the American Journal of Physics, or willing to fork over $21 to donwload this articleand enlighten us all?
In your article, Table 2 shows Diet Coke with mint Mentos sprays a distance of 15.3 feet while Coke Classic sprays 11.6 feet. Caffeine-free Diet Coke sprays 16.3 feet. Diet Coke with fruit Mentos sprays 17.8 feet.
Here’s a pic from Wikipedia comparing various carbonated drinks, including regular and Diet Coke.
It doesn’t look to me as if the Diet Coke is actually fizzier; it seems to have a denser foam that holds together better. I’d speculate that many organic compounds with a polar moiety will do the same thing (as was suggested in that miserable mythbusters episode), and that a truly spectacular fountain would be produced by carbonated water with a little detergent in it.