Mindless Perspectives Some Intuitively Mutilate Simultaneously

Depends on how big the cat was that originally hit the ball of string, maybe that’s what the big bang was

#1 - Is POCAE a weird way of getting away with saying a$$h*l3 in Cantonese
#2 - You experienced what i would describe as a moment of Absolute Clarity

Imagine what the amoebae are thinking about us.


All I want to convey is that some of our cultural “rust” is starting to show, badly. Religion, Science, Education are all controlled forms of universal understanding, under our current preconceptions only regurgitated unoriginal thoughts will arise from these constraints.

The Double slit experiment for example has shown us that it is possible that we may have limited control over subatomic reactions, therefore, given the proper focus and direction our perception may open up a gate of new understanding.

Been there done that, got the T-shirt is a perfect example as to what is wrong with the overall culture (or meme space - where thought/action/events occur).

If you introduce multiple dimensions of thought within a given M-Brane or planar existence, the resultant finite events occur, within given variables.

Once you Kick the Door, Someone on the other side say wtf was that.

If all it takes is a loud enough expression of thought, a thought-gate could open up endless new variables within the given D-Brane space (the dimensional space our bodies occupy).

Maybe that is what the spirit/soul/outer-energy mythology is all about recently several times in our recent history 10,000 years some individuals have expressed a form of this higher energy that allowed them to interpret multiple alternate universes at once. Always being able to choose the absolute best version of their reality. This is called your Merkabah.

Good luck trying to understand what I’m talking about it seems most of you are willing to talk part though some of you are not enjoying the conjecture, i like both sides :slight_smile:

PS. Consensual Reality is what the general mob discipline of morality is currently believing most strongly <<<<<<< Word Chicken Caesar Salad

This guy gets it

I truly don’t, nor will any of us.

I do appreciate the compliment though.

dnooman speaks jive!

Randy : Can I get you something?
Second Jive Dude : ‘S’mofo butter layin’ me to da’ BONE! Jackin’ me up… tight me!
Randy : I’m sorry, I don’t understand.
First Jive Dude : Cutty say ‘e can’t HANG!
Jive Lady : Oh stewardess! I speak jive.
Randy : Oh, good.
Jive Lady : He said that he’s in great pain and he wants to know if you can help him.
Randy : All right. Would you tell him to just relax and I’ll be back as soon as I can with some medicine?
Jive Lady : Jus’ hang loose, blood. She gonna catch ya up on da’ rebound on da’ med side.
Second Jive Dude : What it is, big mama? My mama no raise no dummies. I dug her rap!
Jive Lady : Cut me some slack, Jack! Chump don’ want no help, chump don’t GET da’ help!
First Jive Dude : Say 'e can’t hang, say seven up!
Jive Lady : Jive dude don’t got no brains anyhow! Hmmph!

Sa-da-tay, my damies!

I gonna sign yo pity on the runny kine.

Kappa-chow

Well so there is stuff I don’t understand and it might be like really weird?

Cool, let me know when you have figured it out, I need to go and play with my unicorn.

My dog sniffed when she read this and says it’s somewhere between 1,000 and 10,000,000 times better and could I never ever ever change my socks.

… and due to that last post I can go to…

Mornington Crescent!

TAKE THAT!

That awkward moment when the raving loon points you out as an example of a kindred spirit, and you have to stop and reevaluate your entire life.

Oh, and also, this:

is just completely, completely, totally, 100% WRONG. It’s a complete misinterpretation of what the experiment actually showed us. Wrong wrong wrong.

Not that I expect that to matter.

I thought the “Double Slit Experiment” was physicists’ attempt to get research funding to have a three-way.

Goat left town with my Ipad. Fucker!

Ah, I see that you’ve just opted to ignore absolutely all of the refutations I provided to you, and then make up more nonsense gibberish that you pretend is based in Physics.
~golf clap~

This is utterly, and completely, invented. There are no “reactions” going on in Young’s Experiment that we control, at all. In point of fact, depending on how we set up Young’s Experiment, the only thing we really change is where we collapse the wave function in the device, and whether or not that leaves us with enough Uncertainty that we can still get an interference pattern and whether or not we want to have our quanta appear as particles, waves, or both simultaneously.

I’m sure you won’t acknowledge your error let alone fix it, but hey, the rest of us can realize you’re laughably wrong, eh?

This is gobbledygook, again.
First off, it’s p-brane, or membrane, or just 'brane for short. Not “M-Brane”. Second, no, there are no “dimensions of thought”, that’s yet more sophomoric rambling. Naturally, you really are simply babbling, with the rest. You specified no “finite events” (all events are finite, that’s what an “event” means.), nor which “given variables” would be modified. Simply adding 7 more spatial dimensions does not in and of itself change anything. No, not even if you next hint obliquely at Flatland.

[quote=“shadowofneo, post:81, topic:656623”]

a thought-gate could open up endless new variables within the given D-Brane space (the dimensional space our bodies occupy).

[quote=“shadowofneo, post:81, topic:656623”]

Do I really need to say it?
In case you’re curious, see how many times you can find the phrase “thought-gate” in this actual physics paper.

There’s nothing to ‘understand’, any more than there’s a need for folks to sit and ponder the nuances in a street preacher’s eschatological ravings. You either can not or will not correct your argument for its grossest factual and logical errors. How on Earth can you ever pretend to have an argument, rather than something approximating stoners sitting around a college dorm room, if you can’t even adhere to basic factual accuracy?

Has shadowofneo gone back to the 8th dimension?

If need be, I’ll lend him my oscillating overthruster.

Is that the same thing as an undulating overthruster?

I thought you couldn’t insult other members in this forum?

:smiley:

So glad you asked! As you know, matter is composed mostly of empty space, right down to the quantum level: within an atom, most of that atom’s total volume consists of relatively vast spaces between the subatomic particles, although the particles do remain tethered to each other by electromagnetic force. Early quantum theory suggests that EM force may consist of “virtual photons” that have no mass and naturally fill such otherwise empty spaces.
The oscillating overthruster powers two colliding beams (one stream of electrons, one of positrons) which annihilate each other, creating create intermediate vector bosons as a by-product. The vector bosons are then magnetically collected and focused into another beam, now capable of imparting mass to those pesky virtual photons, thereby weakening the EM force that binds matter. Everything reverts to normal pretty quickly, but a fast-moving object can pass through the affected matter before the window closes.

However, with an undulating overthruster, all that happens is you crash into the wall and get turned into just so much tomato paste. I’ve lost so many lab assistants that way.

Ok, that was funny.