Word on the street is that The Dallas Mavericks in-the-news-right-now-owner is only the majority owner, and that minority shares are held by the two previous owners (perhaps 5% each).
What is the purpose of keeping 5% of the ‘ownership’? I presume it is stock. I would imagine the previous owners had to take less of a buying price in order to keep that 5%, which in turn gives them no chance of running the Franchise as they will be outvoted.
I assume they think that there’s a chance that the Dallas Mavericks may spike up in value in the future and they’d like to have a piece of that potential profit.
This is really the answer. You get to say you own part of the team, sit in the owners box, get a ring when you win championships. Sure you don’t control but neither do most smart owners you hire people to run the business and then write checks
This. George W. Bush purchased a 2% share in the Texas Rangers for $606,000 in 1989. When the Rangers were sold in 1998, he received nearly $15 million on that initial investment.
Pretty sweet deal that one. Bush was the “managing general partner” of the Rangers even though he had a comparatively tiny share compared to the other folks you’ve never heard of. Name trumps skin in the game in that case.
For the owner’s box? My daughter-in-law was the private secretary of a Microsoft VP who was also a minority owner of the Mariners. We all (my wife, son, DIL, and me) watched a game from his owner’s box one day–free.