9 to 4 is frigging amazing. If the playoffs are only random you’re 7 to 1 if you win a division, 15 to 1 if you win a wild card. I cna see 9 to 4, though. The Astros are loaded and their four best starting pitchers are awesome, and in the postseason you can ride four starters harder than you can in the regular season.
I too am damn impressed by the Astros, who are utterly loaded. Comparing them to the 1998 Yankees, though, is a tough one. Which is better? Let’s assume the Astros plow everyone in the playoffs like the Yankees did.
-
The Astros aren’t going to win 114 games, so that goes to the '98 Yankees. The Astros are 104-54 so far.
-
The 1998 Yankees scored 965 runs and allowed 656; they had the league’s best offense (by a small margin) AND allowed the fewest runs (by a wide margin.) Their Pythagorean is 108-54 so they were a bit lucky to win 114 games.
The Astros have scored 899 runs, which in third in the AL and they’re not going to catch up unless the weekend is really crazy. they have allowed 628 runs, which is second, just a hair behind Cleveland. Houston’s Pythagorean exactly matches their record.
So far the Yankees are more statistically dominant.
- What about context? So here’s the thing; relative dominance depends on your opposition. The 1998 Yankees happened in an expansion year, and they were in a division with an expansion team, the (Devil) Rays. The Rays went 63-99 and the Yankees went 11-1 against them. On the other hand, Houston has rolled this up in a year when the gap between good and bad teams is really wide. There are three 100-loss teams in the AL, which is genuinely amazing; adding the MArlins in the NL that’s a record for 100 loss teams, and it’s only the seventh time we’ve had three 100-win teams (and it is still possible there could be as many as five.) Houston has gone 13-4 against the three shit teams in the AL. 1998, despite is being an expansion year, was a very slightly more balanced year.
I admit this kind of surprises me because if you LOOK at the Astros’ stats there’s something about them that looks better. The 1998 Yankees has no pitcher as dominant as Justin Verlander or Gerrit Cole, and they had lots of offensive stars but no one of them had as good a year as Alex Bregman has had. It seems like Houston has more award winners.
If you go by WAR Houston’s very best players are a bit better than New York’s. This slightly undervalues the Yankees, of course, because BBRef assigns WAR based on runs scored and allowed, not how many games you actually win, and as noted the Yankees were six games better than Pythagorean. That might even it up a bit but not entirely. The Astros are more top heavy. (It adds to the impression that the Astros hit WAY more home runs, which looks impressive, but in context, the 1998 Yankees were just as good at hitting homers.)
Still, it remains the fact the Yankees were more dominant. they won more games and were more definitively the better team in the league - best offense, best pitching/defense, and no team was remotely close. The 1998 Yankees finished twelve games ahead of the second best team in the AL, the Red Sox, which is a remarkable achievement. The 2019 Astros are only two and a half games ahead of the 2019 Yankees.
I gotta pick the 1998 Yankees.