I thought of this because I bought My Sister’s Keeper on my Kindle the other day. I really despised the end of this book, but I liked the book itself, so I decided I could just read up to the end and then stop.
Now, as I said, open spoilers, so here’s the plot of the book. There’s this couple, who have a son, Jesse, and then a daughter, Kate. Kate is diagnosed with leukemia.
Mom and Dad, upon finding that Jesse isn’t a good match for Kate, decide to have another daughter, Anna, who they genetically engineer as much as possible with today’s technology to be an exact match for Anna. Basically they extract a bunch of embryos and pick the one that is the closest match.
From the time Anna is born she is basically considered spare parts for Kate. That doesn’t mean they don’t love Anna, but they take blood, tissue, spinal fluid, and anything else Kate needs, without ever asking Anna. Some of these procedures are very painful.
On top of all of that, Anna and Jesse’s entire lives are subjugated to Kate’s needs. Nothing they ever do is important enough; if Kate has a setback or a hospital visit or anything else, they are instantly relegated to a distant second place. Understandable on the part of Mom and Dad, but it does affect the kids greatly.
When the book opens, Anna is being told to give up a kidney for her sister. Anna goes to a lawyer to demand emancipation from her family and legal & medical rights over her own body. This of course throws a huge wedge in the family. Meanwhile, Jesse is living in the garage, neglected, and into drugs, and generally a layabout.
Eventually it turns out that Kate has actually gone to the lawyer because Anna has asked her to do so. Anyway, this is presented as a huge moral dilemna.
Except…I never found this to be a moral dilemna, at all. Everything Mom and Dad did is wrong. Making a kid just to be backup parts, neglecting your elder child, prioritizing the sick child to the point where the other children feel like they have to act out just to get attention, and doing everything else they did, is nothing but wrong to me, on every level. And I hated the parents for doing it.
The ending pissed me off and surprised me too. In the end, (Open Spoilers, remember?) Anna dies in a car accident and thus Kate gets all her organs and lives on to adulthood anyway. It seemed like such a cheap copout to me, but when I started reading on the Internet about it, people all said that the author “couldn’t alienate either fanbase by choosing a side” so she picked this middle ground.
It made me want to spit on the book, I tell you - I hate feeling robbed of a proper ending, and I was firmly in Anna’s camp. After you spend the whole book rooting for her and then she dies anyway…it seemed like a cheat.
But again it’s because I never saw a moral dilemna at all. And maybe some people can explain to me the other side of it. I know the parents wanted to save their baby but the way they did it was downright heinous.
Also, what about other such ‘dilemnas’ that you can only see one side of? I’m sure there are lots.