Swing, and a miss, Mark. I would ** imply ** planets if all I did was talk about them. If, on the other hand I was to measure, and evaluate the light emissions of a stellar object over time, and compare them to mathematical models of doppler shifting due to acceleration from non-radiating near objects, I might ** infer ** the existence of planets. I would more than likely eschew implications, and simply state the observations upon which I made my inferences.
After that I might be able to imply that you were a pretentious pissant, although you might not have the intelligence implied by my assessment that you could infer the insult intended in my implication.