I am still enjoying the cultural superiority of a person who uses the term “moron” but thinks that the plural of hillbilly is “hillbilly’s”.
A typo he acknowledged right away and asked for a correction on…which you would know if you had bothered to read the very first post.
There he is, enjoying his one brief flash of smug superiority, and you got to squash it! Czarcasm for Grinch of the Year Award.
It wasn’t worth reading after the title.
Which still makes it more worthwhile than anything elucidator has posted for the past decade or so.
Ooooh, snap!
No, not snap. What’s that other thing that not snap?
Oh, yeah-fail.
Nobody noticed that he also misspelled “moran”?
Quash, my hillbilly friend. Quash.
It’s from the Arabic: Q’ash. As in the Koranic Phrase: And Allah sent an angel unto the city to q’ash the rebellion…
Because only an idiot would complain when someone else is promoting your religion for you?
Uzi is a master of supreme and subtle irony.
Or, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. I mean, if folks are going to try and debate this, then it’s fair to point out logical fallacies.
Says the guy that can’t even splel.
Ahem. “Peckerwood”, a subset of the redneck tribes, as are the hillbillies, but far more culturally and intellectually advanced.
Yes, that would have made it into a very interesting and eye-opening exercise for the kids. For the Greek, they could even do the “Kyrie Elieson, Christe Elieson” prayer (“Lord, have mercy, Christ, have mercy”). Going beyond that, they could have a Hindu chant in Sanskrit (a language rather close to Greek, actually), a neo-Druid chant in Gaelic, or a passage from the Book of the Dead in Ancient Egyptian.
I plead alignment to the flakes of the untitled snakes of a merry cow, and to the Republicans for which they scam, one nacho, underpants, divisible, with licorice and jugs of wine for owls.
Huh? You lost me. Who is promoting what religion here?
“Conservative Twits Learn that They DO Want Separation of Church and State After All”
Film at 11
A person can’t become part of a religion until they have at least heard about it. So, if I was a cult leader I’d have no objection to anyone introducing someone to my religion as long as it was done in a neutral or positive way. From my pov, that would be a promotion of my religion. What the person doing it thought of what they were doing isn’t relevant to my position. Thus the only ones objecting to this are opposing cult leaders and their worshippers, those who see offense whenever culture is, in their minds, appropriated, and some of us who think religion should be left out of schools. Well, left out unless taught by someone like Richard Dawkins.