I always thought The Red Shoes was pretty over the top. Girl likes red shoes - obviously that means she’s an ungrateful slut who deserves to get her feet cut off.
There was another Andersen tale about a little girl who uses a loaf of bread to keep her feet out of the mud (she uses the loaf as a stepping stone). She immediately gets SUCKED INTO THE BOWELS OF HELL for eternity. Her parents tell her she deserved it and ask her to think of the starving children in Africa OMFG!!!1!!!111!!!11!
Well, Jessica and Elizabeth go to SV University, along with several friends. Jessica meets and falls in love with Mike, who’s a “bad boy” (not really - he just hangs out in pool bars) and she marries him (because Lila had married an Italian Count who was later killed in a speed boat crash - she then returns to SVU). Mike is vaguely a jerk who talks to other girls, drama ensues, and Steven (the brother who is also there) gets into an argument, the gun accidently goes off and Mike is now paralyzed. Jessica annuls the marriage and joins a sorority.
Elizabeth goes to SVU and gets depressed and gains 30 pounds, then gets happy and joins the college TV station, and reports on sports stars getting bribes, which ensnares Todd, and they break up. Todd goes on to turn into a drunk college drop-out and ends up sleeping with Enid. Elizabeth falls in love with a guy at the TV station and ends up being stalked by the head of the SVU “Secret Society” who’s in love with her. He tries to kill her several times, and ends up in a mental institution.
It’s the same SV crowd, but with slightly bigger and complex problems. The morality tales continue however, and the series is very great.
This sounds and looks like a bad translation of the German Struwwelpeter, and therefore, the same applies: it was written in 1845 by a pediatrician in Frankfurt. The story of Pauline and the Matches, for example, was based on a lot of real-life burnings of children, because back then, matches were a new thing just introduced on the market. Neither parents nor children were fully aware of the dangers of them.
I don’t think a book written in 1845 based on real-life experiences of Dr. Hoffmann in his work as pediatrican counts in the same category as a movie using scare-mongering about non-existant dangers.
What I came to say. Made worse because it’s CAFFEINE PILLS!!! Don’t know if this counts, but I always laughed at the Ann Landers / Dear Abby column, Please God, I’m only 17.
Wait, you believe that an imaginary boogeyman who chases kids who suck their thumbs to chop them off is more realistic than a movie that exaggerated the threat of a real drug with documented negative qualities?
I don’t know if you felt special for having looked something up and got confused about the details of what you were arguing or if you’ve just demonstrated one of the dangers of pot.
Is what I was thinking (well, actually it was more “…the fuck?” but you got there first).
I’d agree with Dio on chick tracts, they’re the most vile things I’ve ever seen. I’m a firm atheist and they make ME feel bad. I read one that had two teens form a suicide pact and the boy went through with it and found himself in hell where his eternal torment was started, and the girl was stopped at the last minute by her parents who explained to her what a lucky escape she’d had. And this is meant for KIDS??? I nearly vomited reading it.
Any “Very Special Episode” of any sitcom. Or the old PSAs you used to see during Saturday morning cartoons.
“The More You Know…” Remember, they’d have a moral dilemma, it would pause right before the person had to make their decision, go to a commercial, and then it would come back, and the person would make the “right decision.”
(I wish I could have watched those gory driver’s ed films.)