Lots of people talk about how they want to “make a difference in the world,” but few think concretely about how to do it, besides vague idealistic generalities. Let’s figure out the best way to really do it.
To start with, let’s assume that you’re a person of above-average intelligence, but no genius. You have no problem getting into a top-tier school, but you’re unlikely to win a Nobel, so basic research is not the obvious way to change the world. Similarly, your social skills are good enough that you’ll be socially welcome in any crowd, but you don’t have natural-politician level charisma.
For this thread, “making a difference” is quantified as (amount of change in well-being) x (number of people), and of course it can be positive or negative. The reference point is whatever would have happened if you hadn’t existed. So, if you invent cold fusion, say, you get credit for discovering it three months before a competing group of researchers would have discovered it, but you don’t get credit for all the effects that cold fusion has on people’s lives thereafter. Similarly, if you get elected President, you only get credit for the political decisions that you would have made differently than whoever would be President in your stead.
For our above-average but unspectacular character, I see two big ways of making a difference. For good, he could apply himself in business (where both charisma and intelligence are needed), amass as much money as he can, and donate it to a carefully researched, highly effective charity (such as microfinance in the poorest countries, where the money would go farthest).
For evil, successfully conduct a terrorist attack in a first-world country. The number of casualties may not be great, but the knock-on effects of paranoia in a national population would make the effective impact huge.
Anyone have better ideas?