Yeah, yeah-Hitchens bad mans. I think we all get your point by now.
How about citing where he got his facts wrong?
I’ll have to ask for a cite for these claims since you use it so repeatedly.
Sometimes saints have done what ought to be thought of as indisputably horrible things. Saint Thomas More had people burned people alive for heresy. And that including having/reading the Bible. Saint Pope John Paul II turned a blind eye and deaf ear to the sexual molestation of children and let priests stay in positions where they could continue to molest children.
Yes, I heard about Mother Teresa, pregnancy and not supporting contraception back when she was alive. Probably if she’d supported contraception, she wouldn’t be considered for sainthood as it breaks doctrine.
As I said in my piece, [URL=“http://maggieameanderings.com/2014-Jul-13.htm"]"Why I’m More Moral Than God,”](MSN) “But sainthood is less about being truly moral and more hinged upon miracles…Yet according to the Bible the spirits of devils can perform miracles, so miracles seem a poor criteria for sainthood to me.” Yes, I was being somewhat facetious in the piece, but I do think sainthood ought to have more to do with how you lived your life and less to do with supposed miracles attributed to you after death. And your life is a sum total of the good and the harm you did.
Dr. Schweitzer came in for the same kind of criticism…but the fact is, he actually did some good! True, his clinic wasn’t the best, but something is infinitely better than nothing. Did Hitchens ever comfort a dying street bum? As Eleanor Roosevelt once said, it is better to light a single candle than spend all day cursing the dark.
QED.
Well this has been interesting. It leaves me with the same problem, a scarcity of facts, and an uneasy feeling about a subject that has only been examined from opposite extreme points of view. What bothers me the most is that the criticism is generally shouted down without factual counter. The response will be all about good intentions, but no demonstration of results. On the flip side of that the task of serving the poor in Calcutta is like standing in the surf to stop the waves, how much success could anyone have?
I’m not sure what your point is. What must a persons credentials be before they can criticise an individual? Are yours strong enough to have a pop at Hitchens?
Thank you-I was just about to make the same point. Must one be a nun that has worked with the poor in Calcutta to criticize Mother Teresa in this thread?
If anyone finds it interesting, Hitchens debated Bill Donohue and Theresa came up here, though Donohue’s rebuttal (at least at first) is a counterattack on Hitchens and not a defense of Theresa.