Moussaoui not linked with 9/11 ???

Great Debates
#1

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1432629,00.html
quote from link:

Washington - The US Federal Bureau of Investigation has concluded that Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person charged in America in connection with the September 11 attacks, was not involved in the strikes, Time magazine reported on Sunday.

The news weekly, in its edition appearing on Monday, quotes unidentified sources as saying the FBI has long believed that the Moroccan-born Frenchman “played no part in the 9/11 scheme and was only a minor player in al-Qaeda.”

Hmm…Moussaoui 's link to Al-Qaeda has been established, but it would appear that he was not meant to be involved in the 9/11 attacks. Does the US still have grounds to hold/charge him, and what do you think the charges/sentence would be? Would he HAVE to be tried in a civil court now?

#2

Here is the indictment
http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/moussaouiindictment.htm

Does the US still have grounds to hold/charge him, and what do you think the charges/sentence would be?

At least 2 of the Counts:Conspiracy to Commit Acts of Terrorism Transcending National Boundaries (Count One)
&
Conspiracy to Destroy Property of the United States (Count Six)

These two at the very least seem to stand independantly of whether he was the actual 20th Highjacker – as he has said he (paraphased) was with al Queda, just on another mission.

Would he HAVE to be tried in a civil court now?

They have always kept the option of a tribunal open. Apparently DoJ guys wanted to show this could be done in civil court.

If they absolutely want the Death Penalty in this case, now they apparently will have to use a military tribunal. If not, there is no reason the civil trial can’t proceed. It was always legally/evidenciary much easier to paint him as a terrorist conspiring with and aiding others others to kill americans, than charge him with being an actual 20th hijacker per se, but it does mean there will be no death penalty if they go this route.

#3

What was his “mission” in the US then ? If they haven’t figured that out… then how do they know he is Al Qaeda ? Wierd…

#4

*what was his “mission” in the US then ? If they haven’t figured that out… then how do they know he is Al Qaeda ? *

Because ZM has admitted in Open Court & in court filings that he is a member of al Queda in America on a separate mission (Which Ramzi Binalshibi seems to back up)

http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/14/moussaoui.trial/

** Raskak** to make sense of why anyone not pleading guilty would make such a daming statement, you need to recall that this Genius has been acting as his own counsel

#5 
A Lawyer would make him keep quiet or negotiate.

Still why have an operative in the US, with flight training in order to make attacks in other countries ? Doesn’t make much sense. The fact that he had way more money than necessary is interesting thou…

Something still seems wrong with this whole story...