Movies that could not be made in today’s world

Similar sentiments have been expressed here. I guess it depends on how you choose to define ‘get made today’. Things To Do In Denver When Your Dead could, of course, be made today providing it had a heavy re-write (as noted in the OP). But I suspect if released as a new movie today, as is, there might be a bit of a backlash against the casual homophobia and racism, as it’s not intrinsic to the plot. In fact, it appears just to be tacked on to provide edginess.

As others have pointed out, offensiveness that’s vital to the plot probably wouldn’t make even with a re-write.

I’m hoping with you… but I fear it is not.

I always figured it was satirical, specifically about the thought processes in Hollywood that led to “I Am Sam” and “Rainman”. I mean, if you’re aware of those two movies, it seems pretty obvious that Ben Stiller’s character was essentially doing the same thing, but was so blithely unaware of how problematic “Simple Jack” was. Kind of a “Let’s exaggerate it’s offensiveness, so we can show how offensive these older movies really were.” sort of thing. Maybe I’m reading too much into it, but that’s what I came away from it with, not so much that they were directly making fun of the mentally handicapped.

I remember a Sinbad video where he performed in front of a primarily black audience and he started talking about the Civil War. He said “Y’all would have hated me. I’d have been the first to rat out all the black people. ‘Massah Johnson, I saw some slaves slippin’ out the back door into the woods!’ (pretends another person is talking) ‘Oh, they ain’t my people! YOU my people!’”

The audience was howling with laughter. So was I, mostly out of shock. No white comedian could have gotten away with that.

You essentially have all that in Django Unchained. Not that Tarantino has never been subject to criticism concerning his content.

See, I don’t think so. Many people in my generation and particularly younger generations would be likely to be highly offended by any white person having blackface for any reason, even if the point was to criticize white people in blackface.

I’m thinking of the scene in Sorry to Bother You where um… ooh. It’s a rough scene I’m afraid to even describe. The protagonist, who is black, attends a work function full of drunken white people who implore him to rap. When he finally does, this happens: (broken link for repeated use of the n-word.)

https://www.youtube.com /watch?v=pNZbfjVGDlQ

The director of the film said it was very difficult to get the white actors to play their part. Even though that is the point of the scene, they didn’t want to do it. Honestly it’s hard to blame them.

(Great film, BTW.)

Easy. Fu Manchu is an agent of the Chinese government, protecting his country from the diabolical criminal mastermind, Denis Nayland Smith.

Or, set it in a neutral country, with Fu Manchu and Nayland Smith as honorable adversaries.

Sure. But that plot is not the reason why Blazing Saddles would have issues today. The main reason is the N-word.

How did they manage to release Django Unchained?

Actually, this has ALWAYS bothered me about the Animal House movie. In fact, there are a lot of such depictions that bothered me when the film came out.

Note I didnt say Blazing Saddles couldnt be made today. I said it would have issues. Django Unchained was criticized for the use of that word, and for being a “parody of slavery”.

Is Django Unchained worthy of the controversy? | by ALaw | Medium.

Apparently it’s not just the theme song that’s problematic.

A 38-year-old writer of pornographic novels named Scott (Charles Bronson) meets and falls in love with a sixteen-year-old school girl (Susan George) whilst living in London.

Lola (1970 film) - Wikipedia

So it’s Lolita with the age raised from 12 to 16 and some porn thrown into the plot?

To give the movie a little credit when the girl wants the man to marry her, he tells her it is a bad idea (but he finally goes along with it). Her family thinks it was a bad idea. His family thinks it was a bad idea. The general public finds out about it and thinks it was a bad idea. After being together for a while the marriage falls apart because of the huge differences between them and they get a divorce. Proving that everybody else that they ever met or ever heard of them thinking it was a bad idea was right. So in the end the movie wasn’t supporting the relationship. (And the guy wrote basically Harlequin romance novels.)

Do they even make high school sex, drugs, & alcohol comedies in the style of Fast Times & Ridgemont High, Dazed and Confused, American Pie, and Superbad anymore? I recognize most of the movies on this list, but none that strike me as particularly iconic.

Maybe with all the helicopter parenting and social media these days, the themes of kids with largely absent parents getting into all sorts of trouble and throwing a massive end of the school year party no longer resonates with today’s youth?

Or the Hateful Eight for that matter. Django Unchained was about the abuses of slavery. The Hateful Eight could probably still been told without Chris Mannix’s constant racist diatribes or Major Warren’s graphic tale of raping Gen Smither’s son.

48 Hours could be made today as a standard mis-matched buddy cop comedy. On having rewatched it on cable recently, cop Nick Nolte sure does call convict Eddie Murphy the n-word a whole lot.

Although, I think the whole point of the movie was that they lived in a very racially divided world (as it was and often is) on opposite sides of the law, yet somehow managed to find mutual ground to catch the bad guy (and make a sequel).

How do you even make a “period movie” now. Show the casual racism of the time and be accused of endorsing it or not showing it leaving yourself vulnerable to accusations of “whitewashing”.

Marriage at 16 is legal is a LOT of states. Just no hanky panky before the vows.

I’m not seeing the racism in the Animal House scene. It’s an accurate depiction of what guys like that who had never been in a black majority environment would act like. (I know that accurate depictions no longer matter, but still.) The joke’s on the white guys. The black people are not doing anything other than how they would be in their normal environment.

I think with “woke” or whatever you want to call it everything will eventually be offensive. It’s not like the Hays Code where there were actually rules laid out. The whole point is to catch people off guard. So it’s more like a witch hunt or Spanish Inquisition.

I think his protrayal in blackface of an Indian in “The Party” would fly even less today.

“The Great Santini” - thoroughly two-dimensional, unhinged, child-harassing wife-beaters (Duvall) probably wouldn’t be the most poplular character these days.

The outlandishly creepy Telly Savalas character from “The Dirty Dozen” might appear, say, in a current slasher film, perhaps, but other than that…

“I Spit On Your Grave”. Sure, there’s incredibly stupid torture porn these days, but some of the over-the-top misogyny here, such as when the raping assailants stand above their beaten victim while laughingly reading aloud from her diary…yeah, that’s just a whole new level of “nah, not these days”.

ETA: A mild one: “A Fish Called Wanda”. I’d be surpirsed if there’ll be another film with a stutterer for “comic effect”.

And see above re: “Life of Brian.”

I don’t think anyone approved of Maggot’s behavior in the film.