moving US embassy to Jerusalem thread

It’s amazing how many people think the US controls policy in Israel.

We recognized their chosen capital. Just like we recognize the capital of France as Paris and the capital of Germany as Berlin. It was Bonn until 1999.

Israel can still give the Palestinians a piece of Jerusalem in a peace place.That’s entirely up to Israel’s leaders to decide.

Except that literally nobody has a competing claim to any part of Washington, nor has anyone been involved in trying to broker peace between the United States and anyone else making a territorial claim.

And of course, the US had been viewed over the last several decades as an honest broker in peace talks. The responses in this thread to the effect of telling Palestinians that they are to blame, or that they should just suck it up, appear to be the same thoughts dominating the debate inside the Administration. Having those thoughts drive the debate is antithetical to the position of being an honest broker. So yeah, it’s a big deal.

In Trump’s defense, he’s doing what the 1995 law says the United States should do, and multiple presidents simply kept deferring and delaying indefinitely. And Jerusalem is indeed the capitol.

But I don’t think anyone in the world regarded the US Congress as an honest broker in peace talks. Arguing, “But I’m just carrying out the will of Congress” is pretty much confirmation that the United States should not be regarded as an honest broker.

I would speculate that most of the Congressmen who passed resolutions calling for the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital were acting no differently that Congressmen who pass resolutions calling for the criminalization of abortions or the legalization of marijuana or the abolition of income taxes. Their intent was to make their voting base happy with a symbolic gesture. They didn’t intend for their resolution to actually have any effect.

I dunno - the Powhatans* might want it back.
*It was the Powhatans, yes? Or were they further south?

Clinton, Bush, and Obama (and Reagan and Bush Sr) were all too smart to do it. Trump wasn’t.

Is the fact that it was a stupid decision a reason not to do it?

It’s the equivalent of burning a flag. You have the legal right to do it. But only idiots actually burn flags. Because it pisses off other people and that doesn’t help whatever your cause is.

So what was Trump and every post-Trump president supposed to do? Sign waivers indefinitely, every six months?

Perhaps, but I haven’t noticed the Powhatan intifada in my many years of living here.

Alan Dershowitz wrote an interesting editorial on the historical background of Jerusalem and its importance to Judaism.

Somehow, I overlooked the importance of Obama’s UN Security Council Resolution last year. I didn’t understand how badly it hurt Israel.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/12/07/alan-dershowitz-why-trump-is-right-in-recognizing-jerusalem-as-israels-capital.html

That’s helpful isn’t it; a Fox Network editorial:

Here’s a two- sided 7-minute expression of views from last night, one of them was even born in Jerusalem: Trump’s Jerusalem announcement: Interview with Mark Regev and Ghada Karmi – BBC Newsnight - YouTube

The solution certainly isn’t to poor gasoline on the fire as trump just did. That’s first tier stupidity, even for trump.

Whatever the wisdom of doing or not doing something may be, you can’t let threats of violence be a factor in your decision. That rewards threats.

If Hamas or other groups see that threatening violence dissuades people from doing something, that’s positive reinforcement for Hamas.

Is it really that hard a thing to do, if the alternative is to throw gasoline on a smoldering fire?

Thank you for the video link. Very interesting discussion.

I read Dershowitz’s column because I respect his legal career and his defense of civil liberties. I wish the column wasn’t published on Fox News. I guess he felt it needed a liberal voice.

It is a very well written and often informative column.

This has no benefit to us. If you’re walking down the sidewalk and a random man dared you to knock a chip off his shoulder, should you do it? Otherwise you’ll be rewarding veiled threats!

The US to the Palestinians: “Make peace or we will recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.”

No peace is made for twenty years.

The US: “OK, we now recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.”

The Palestinians: “No fair! We were just getting ready to cooperate! You aren’t an honest broker!”

Regards,
Shodan

But I don’t think anyone who follows this issue really cares what Hamas thinks: they are a radical organization that basically isn’t worth talking to. Nobody is suggesting that anyone do something to appease Hamas.

The issue is whether the decision pushes moderate Palestinians to take extreme steps. That is worth considering.

If we were talking about a domestic issue of whether some politician should endorse some policy or vote some way on a particular bill, obviously there could be extreme views on either side of such a debate. Most politicians would say, “Yeah, but I’m never going to win over those weirdos.” But if the politician thought that voting some way on a bill would lead to normal working-class voters taking to the streets, they would be wise to take a minute to consider what they were really trying to achieve, and whether the cost is worth it.

And israel has no responsibility or agency in this?