The New York Times always calls him Mr. Clinton. I think the first reference to him may be President Bill Clinton, but after that it’s Mr. Clinton.
If you watch “Meet the Press” or other shows of its ilk, all the political figures are called “President” or “Senator” or “Representative” on first reference and then “Mr.” or “Ms.” afterwards.
It is a standard practice of news organizations to refer to the president as “President Clinton” in the first reference and “Mr. Clinton” thereafter. The president is the only American given that courtesy, except, as you have probably seen, in obituaries.
The courtesy may be extended after the person leaves office, or not, depending on the organization and the context.
And just to round out journalistic style, a president who leaves office is properly refered to as “former president” and not “ex-president” (even Nixon!)
Dissent: The honorific “President” is supposed to be used in all circumstances when he is holding office. The use of the term “Mr.” (and nowadays, the dropping of any term at all and using simply the last name, as in “Clinton”) originated as a deliberate slight during the War of 1812, when it was derisively termed Mr. Madison’s War.
I still think it should be considered disrespectful–and used often, should the president in question deserve it.
Mr. Clinton was used during the whole impeachment nastiness. After he was not convicted, I thought they all went back to saying President Clinton and addressing him as Mr. President.
What if a President is a PhD? Is it “President Dr. DAYUIZ?” I have spent many a night tossing and turning with this question burning in my head. Please help me to end the pain!
Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee is an MD. He is always referred to as Senator Frist or Mr. Frist. In the Senate, he is not called Dr. Frist.
If he’s carrying his medical bag with him and tending to you, then you can call him Dr. Frist. I believe when he was running for office he was Dr. Frist.
I don’t know how many presidents had Ph.D’s. I believe Wilson had one, but he may be the only one.
The question was taken up by the Founding Dads, IIRC, as to how to refer to President Washington. At that time, there was considerable sentiment in favor of imperial type honorifics, i.e. Your Highness, Your Majesty, etc. They rejected all of that, with Washington taking the lead,in favor of Mr. President, as they wanted nothing to do with any hint of royalty. This was taken in Europe as further proof that the USA was a band of seething revolutionary radicals who would never amount to anything. That’s history. You can’t make stuff like this up.
The Senate wanted to call the President “His Highness, the President of the United States of America and Protector of the Rights of the Same.”
John Adams, the first vice-president and the first president of the Senate, also wanted to build a throne for Washington.
The House thought all this to be a silly idea and opted for “Mr. President” and Washington agreed to that.