Ah, forgive me because everything you write could come straight from the mouth of a wannbe pogue militia fruitbat.
Gee, did I touch a nerve by pointing out how full of shit your arguments are? I felt left out that you haven’t called me buddy or boy yet and suddenly I’m hit up with all this abusive language.
Yes, you can tell this by the fact that my arguments make sense and yours are well, completely delusional.
Oh, and PS
All of your alleged 11 Bravo knowledge apparently didn’t include the basics of security.
So, correct me if I’m wrong (as I’m sure you will, even if I’m right), but are you arguing that these militia types won’t have a problem with killing innocents, but that the army will?
I realize that we have some examples of militia types killing people, but it would appear that the vast majority are blowhard wannabes, while people in the military train to kill people all the time.
But to Japanese civilians, an invasion meant “the monsters are coming!” Just the act of invading would have terrorized them. 22,000 civilians died on and around Saipan to prevent the “monsters” from getting them, same with the 80,000 or so on and around Okinawa. Apply the same percentage (one-sixth) from Okinawa to Japan and Truman would have been looking at 12 million civilians who decided to end their life honorably instead of in the hands of the “monsters”.
Darwin in action.
Religious propaganda via brainwashing, not Darwin. Hirohito presented himself as a god and Japan’s victory ordained by the heavens. Although the thousands of civilians jumping from Saipan’s Banzai Cliff would have resembled lemmings.
No, you touched a nerve by suggesting it is “pussy” to refrain from killing one’s own countrymen.
Yeah, because dams are on high alert all the time, and it is absolutely impossible to coordinate simultaneous strikes on multiple targets :rolleyes:
Insurgents (revolutionaries, terrorists, etc) have the advantage of choosing where and when to attack and do not have to constantly be on the defensive. It is much easier to avoid unintended damage in this position, not to mention being less psychologically taxing.
Except, when you set off bombs that kill innocent people, everyone hates you. You can’t blend back into the population unless a significant portion of the population supports you. And why are they supporting you blowing up office buildings and murdering cops?
If Americans don’t have the guts to kill their own countrymen, then how is it that militia members will?
What exactly do these insurgents hope to accomplish by blowing up dams and day care centers? To force the ZOG to give up and go home? That’s not going to happen, because they are home. It ain’t like Vietnam where we finally get tired of fighting halfway across the world for no real purpose. Here in the good old US of A, the local powers that be will be fighting for their very survival–they’ll be swinging from lamp-posts if your militia pals have their way.
cough Hey genius, that’s **your **argument, not mine. Apparently this only applies to those on the side of the evil gov’ment though, blowing up their own innocent countrymen isn’t an issue for the brave militia.
Hey stupid, the basics of security as in not shooting your mouth off about likely targets. Loose lips sink ships and all that.
Maybe if you’re fighting invaders. It’s got to be psychologically taxing to be on the run from the rest of the country, and widely considered a traitor. In a country as patriotic and well armed as the US of A, for every rebellious militia type, there’s gonna be two or three equally well armed patriotic types as well as a well trained military, all of whom are going to feel like they’re “stomping out traitors”, not shooting their countrymen.
How do serial killers blend into American suburbia?
It would take a lot of motivation to blow up a federal building, dam, etc. In order to do such a thing, you’d have to first be willing to kill for your ideas.
Federal buildings I don’t understand, except from the position of making a statement. Same goes for the Twin Towers.
I was going to argue that taking out enough dams in the US could cause production and commerce to cease due to loss of electricity, but I looked it up and the we rely far less on hydroelectricity than I thought (definitely less than 7%, perhaps even less than 6%). So I’m out of thoughts on what might be the most effective choke points to attack in America.
My original point was that bringing down the infrastructure of the country - in order to cause chaos - would be a lot easier than trying to outvote or replace the current government by force. Whether or not that might be possible with the 100,000 I estimated earlier is no longer something I can stand by with confidence, but I still bet it would take fewer people than it would to unseat the powers that be legally.
Why the hell am I still being labeled a militia type, if I might ask?
Huh? In essence, I said that I don’t think the military is up to the task of considering each and every American a possible enemy. It’s pretty easy to consider obviously armed men in uniform out to stop you from doing what you feel you need to do the enemy.
Hey, look! The White House might be a target for terrorism! Or perhaps the Pentagon?!?
Give me a break; just about every dam in the country was locked down during the morning of 9/11/01.
I forgot that militia members were born with bright red X’s on their foreheads; sorry about that.
Fucking everything was locked down on 9/11. Choose a better example.
Dams are an obvious target for terrorism, REMF (even though it seems I’m giving you too much credit with that particular insult). That was the point.
Oh, come on.
[When it comes to water system sabotage, two types, vandalism and terrorism, need to be considered. Vandalism would interrupt the supply of water and reduces its quantity. Terrorism would contaminate the water and reduces its quality.
As drinking water is essential to human life, denying it for any period could cause panic and disrupt society. Supply interruptions include the destruction of, or interference with, reservoir dams, water towers or storage facilities, pumping stations, intakes, valves, treatment plants, the distribution system, or fire hydrants, denying the population drinking water or firefighting protection. Supply interruptions can be caused by any number of acts, including physical destruction, interruption of the supervisory control and data acquisition system, or acts that could reduce the water pressure in a system. Supply interruptions can also occur as an indirect result of contamination.](Center for Defense Information)
Backpedal much? I didn’t respond to the essence of what you wrote, I responded to what you actually wrote.
Remember that bit? And how they would lack intestinal fortitude when faced with people who speak thier language and look like them and thier buddies? You are the one who thinks they’re too pussy to fight a lunatic militia. It’s entirely disingenuous of you to act offended by the word “pussy” to deflect the discussion away from the utter indefensibility of your position. Your delusional belief that “Most soldiers and Marines would rather see chaos” then perform their duty against people in open rebellion and sit idly by while innocent civilians are bombed is offensive to servicemen and women; much more so than using pussy as a synonym of lacking stomach or intestinal fortitude.
Since you are terribly slow, I’ll spell it out for you: I was mocking you when I noted your lack of understanding of basic operational security. I don’t actually think you’re spilling secret info. I think you’re making yourself look even stupider than you really are (if it’s even possible) with your sudden foray into your alleged 11 Bravoness and everyone else here is a bunch of remfs when faced with the inability to defend how delusional your beliefs are.
No, I’m afraid I’m not the Rotterdam Electronic Music Festival. Sorry.
I’ve decided I’m finished responding to this thread. I’m getting ridiculous here (and feel some of the other posters in this thread have done the same); worse, it’s boring even me. If you like, I would like to read some responses about why so many are calling me a militia type. Just keep in mind that I won’t respond to them under any circumstances.
For the record, I have never joined a militia, have never been interested in joining a militia and do not know anyone currently in or interested in joining a militia.
You sure it’s not because you’re getting your ass handed to you?