I’m not currently in the market (or - more accurately - I’m ALWAYS in the market ;)), but Wordman’s thread about Teles got me to wondering if folk would like to discuss the thought process of changing/upgrading instruments.
At base, I guess, do you seek a Holy Grail - the ONE instrument that will knock your socks off and/or take you to the next level? Or do you just look for something that is significantly better than what you play, and “good enough” for your needs within your budget?
I play with a cellist who is looking into replacing her 150 yr-old cello. It sounds good, but has a soundpost crack, and she could afford more. So she’s been looking at $3k cellos. Most sound/play better than hers, but comparing them is tough. And you can always imagine there is something better out there. My suggestion was that she step up another notch, and look in the $10k range, where the improvement over her current axe will be more profound. Of course, w/ acoustic string instruments, setup is almost as important as the quality of the instrument.
I’m often surprised when I go into music stores, just by the quantity of instruments available. When I see 20 Strats or Les Pauls in every imaginable color - how differently do they play? Or even 20 different Martin dreadnoughts?
Woodwind/percussion/whatever players feel free to chime in?