Chapelle - again there is no one disputing that it was “punching” at the group. The debate is about “punching down” …
Adolescence - Your comment was
And that simply was not what the show did or was about. At all.
In terms of of “incels”? Yes a part of it was broadly how much of our kids lives are impacted by influences that parents are clueless about. About how we parents connect and fail to connect with our children. About how some is luck of the draw. Falling into specific Andrew Tate misogynistic material was part of it yes. If we define incels as that specific philosophy then it does acknowledge the misogynistic aspects of it. But the violence that resulted was, in the show, not so simplistically a direct result of it
How individual public figures react to a show or an issue is a separate subject.