Ok, let’s look at the first post you cite:
Bobkitty: No, because there’s another lane. Much like the dumbass tailgater could have simply crossed over into the oncoming traffic lane when it was empty, people tend to have an amazing capacity to figure out “Hmmm… there’s someone broken down in my lane, I’ll slow down and pass when it’s safe.”
Lucwarm: Right, so all the OP had to do was pull as far to the right as possible and come to a dead stop. Tailgater passes him, end of story.
[a fairly innocuous rebuttal, IMHO. Not particularly special or out-of-line]
Bobkitty: CR 49 in eastern Alabama.
Lucwarm: Kindly describe the location of the 6 miles where it’s impossible for someone to allow a following car to pass.
[A polite request that the poster back up his claim]
Bobkitty: Do you live anywhere near farmland? Or cattle ranches? The ditch is for either irrigation/drainage or to keep the cows from simply wandering around the road (looks something like road–>ditch–>fence–>cows).
Lucwarm: I’ve lived all over the United States. Farmland, desert, urban areas, etc. I have yet to see a stretch of road more than a mile long where it’s impossible to allow a car following you to pass you. The only possible exception I can think of is the center tube of the Lincoln Tunnel which connects New York City and Weehawken, New Jersey.
[another innocuous rebuttal, certainly no worse than the statement being responded to]
Bobkitty: And FTR, my nearest neighbor to the left is exactly 1.8 miles away. Nowhere to pull over, which makes giving directions a snap- just drive until you can turn right. I think that you’re assuming Windwalker and I are talking about regular city or town-type roads, and aren’t taking into account that some people live on the back side of the middle of nowhere.
Lucwarm: Actually there’s no need to debate the nature of the roads any more if you concede that the OP could have allowed the tailgater to pass.
And for the record, I could have been a little clearer when I said there’s alway a place to pull over. I’m not trying to say that you can always get totally clear of the road. I am saying that you can always allow the guy behind you to pass.
[another innocuous rebuttal; and a polite concession that an earlier post may have been unclear]
So what do we have? A few innocuous rebuttals, a polite request that the poster back up his claim, and a concession that an earlier post could have been clearer.
Significantly, in your very example, I make a clear concession. Moreover, I didn’t personally attack the guy or misrepresent his position as far as I know.
Sorry, but these debate tactics are no worse than, and possibly even better than what goes on in the Pit (and Great Debates for that matter) on a regular basis. Just MHO of course.